shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Should I use Electron?

Build cross-platform desktop apps with JavaScript, HTML, and CSS - electronjs.org

Depends. Adopt it if your team already builds web apps and needs one codebase for Windows, macOS, and Linux. Skip it for small utilities or performance-critical desktop software — Tauri or native toolkits fit better.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~50 public sources: official docs, Reddit threads, CVE databases, and developer reviews.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

$0

Open source

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes

Best for

  • Web teams shipping desktop apps
  • One codebase for Windows/macOS/Linux
  • Complex apps like IDEs and chat clients
  • Teams reusing existing JS code

Not for

  • Lightweight utility apps — too heavy
  • Performance-critical or low-RAM software
  • Teams without JavaScript/web skills
  • Security-sensitive products without patch resources

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

You own security patching: CVEs like runAsNode required urgent app-level fixes

high

nodeIntegration true or contextIsolation false has caused real app RCEs

medium

Apps can feel slow after OS updates; Apple Silicon and macOS changes need tracking

low

Free framework, but hiring Electron devs costs real money

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Free and MIT-licensed
  • Reuse JavaScript, HTML, CSS skills across all three desktop platforms
  • Proven at scale by VS Code, Discord, and Skype
  • Actively maintained with public RFC process

Cons

  • Bundles full Chromium: large installers and heavy memory use
  • Persistent developer backlash over bloat and slowness
  • Steady stream of public CVEs requiring fast upgrades
  • Common misconfigurations expose apps to remote code execution

Sources & method

Analyzed 10/04/2026 - 8 sources - Mature but CVE-prone: multiple recent vulnerabilities demand prompt upgrades and careful configuration.

official x3review x2security x2news x1
  • Use-after-free in WebContents fullscreen/pointer-lock (CVE-2026-34771), Memory-corruption bug in recent Electron releases.
  • Additional 2026 CVE (CVE-2026-34769), Tracked vulnerability in Electron, impact details public.
  • runAsNode exploit chain (2024), Official statement issued; apps needed configuration fixes.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 5/5

    Rating

  • $0

    Starting price

  • 8

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 5/5. Free and MIT-licensed
  • Ease of use: 3/5. Easy for web devs; setup friction reported
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Full Chromium plus Node, mature ecosystem
  • Support quality: 3/5. Community support only, no vendor SLA
  • Security posture: 2/5. Frequent CVEs; demands constant patching
  • $0 Price Open source, MIT license
  • Yes Free tier Fully free framework, community-supported
  • 4.9/5 Third-party rating Brainhub developer guide, 2026
  • OpenJS Foundation Governance Community donations via OpenCollective

Pricing

Open source

$0

  • MIT-licensed framework
  • Chromium + Node.js runtime
  • Community support, no SLA

Security

Mature but CVE-prone: multiple recent vulnerabilities demand prompt upgrades and careful configuration.

  • Use-after-free in WebContents fullscreen/pointer-lock (CVE-2026-34771)Memory-corruption bug in recent Electron releases.
  • Additional 2026 CVE (CVE-2026-34769)Tracked vulnerability in Electron, impact details public.
  • runAsNode exploit chain (2024)Official statement issued; apps needed configuration fixes.⁷

What users say

Developers love shipping one web codebase everywhere but widely complain about memory bloat, security churn, and app sluggishness.

“Why can't ElectronJS just die? (rant)”
Reddit, r/programminghorror
“Is Electron really this bad?”
Reddit, r/AskProgramming
“Good when it works: Electron.js review from the eyes of a new developer”
Medium

Alternatives

Compare Electron with each alternative.

  • Tauri

    Rust-based alternative with far smaller app footprint.

    Electron vs Tauri

  • Native SDKs (Swift/WinUI/Qt)

    Best performance; costs platform-specific rewrites.

  • Progressive Web App

    Skip the desktop wrapper if a browser tab suffices.

Companies that use it

  • Microsoft (VS Code)
  • Discord
  • Skype
  • Freedom of the Press Foundation (SecureDrop client)
Full analysis

Based on ~50 public sources: official docs, Reddit threads, CVE databases, and developer reviews.

Free MIT framework powering VS Code and Discord; great for web teams, bloated for lightweight apps.

Methodology

Based on ~50 public sources: official docs, Reddit threads, CVE databases, and developer reviews.

Sources

  1. Electron homepageelectronjs.org
    official
  2. Why Electronelectronjs.org
    official
  3. GitHub: electron/electrongithub.com
    official
  4. Why everyone hate electronjs?reddit.com
    review
  5. Why can't ElectronJS just die? (rant)reddit.com
    review
  6. Tauri – Electron alternative written in Rustnews.ycombinator.com
    news
  7. Statement regarding runAsNode CVEselectronjs.org
    security
  8. Electron WebPreferences RCE (Exploit-DB)exploit-db.com
    security

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.