shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Enago Review

Depends

Should I use Enago?

Academic editing and research paper publication service with 3000+ PhD editors - enago.com

· 5 days ago

Buy if you are a non-native English researcher preparing a journal submission and can pay per word. Skip it for casual proofreading, native-level polish, or free AI-only editing.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 30+ public sources; snippets truncated, so detail is limited

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of useNo evidence in sources reviewed
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

Per-word, quoted

Copy Editing

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Substantive EditingHigher per-word rate
Top Impact / PremiumHighest per-word rate

Best for

  • Non-native English researchers
  • Journal submission prep
  • Grad students polishing dissertations
  • Institutions buying editing at scale

Not for

  • Native speakers needing light proofreading
  • Casual blogs or business copy
  • Anyone wanting free AI-only cleanup
  • One-off proofreading on tight budgets

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

Per-word price varies by turnaround and editing level — long papers balloon fast

medium

AI add-ons like Enago Read and Copilot are billed separately from editing

medium

Revision scope sits in the terms of service; confirm re-edit limits before ordering

medium

Editor quality varies; Reddit users recommend reviewing samples first

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Transparent per-word pricing published openly
  • 3,000+ claimed PhD editors across subject areas
  • Full stack: editing, peer review, submission, grant writing
  • Enago Lock adds manuscript file protection
  • ISO 9001:2015 certified workflows

Cons

  • Only 77 Trustpilot reviews despite long history; mixed tone
  • Mixed employee reviews; one Glassdoor review titled 'The SCAM company'
  • Per-word charges compound on long manuscripts
  • AI tools like Enago Read and Copilot are separate paid products
  • Freelance forums report contractor-pay friction

Sources & method

- 11 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. Rankiteo cyber risk score 772/1000; ISO 9001:2015 certified; Enago Lock adds file protection.

official x2review x7security x1news x1

Key stats

  • Value for money: 3/5

    Rating

  • Per-word, quoted

    Starting price

  • 11

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 3/5. Transparent per-word pricing; mixed user value feedback
  • Ease of use. No evidence in sources reviewed
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Editing, peer review, grants, plus AI tool suite
  • Support quality: 3/5. Claims 24/7 support; complaints appear in reviews
  • Security posture: 4/5. Rankiteo 772/1000; no public breaches found
  • 77 Trustpilot reviews mixed tone across 4 pages
  • 3,000+ Claimed PhD editors company figure
  • $3.6M Funding Crunchbase, this year
  • 772/1000 Cyber risk score Rankiteo

Pricing

Copy Editing

Per-word, quoted

  • Grammar and style fixes
  • Faster turnaround options

Substantive Editing

Higher per-word rate

  • Deeper rewriting for clarity
  • Journal formatting support

Top Impact / Premium

Highest per-word rate

  • Multi-round editing
  • High-stakes submissions

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

Rankiteo cyber risk score 772/1000; ISO 9001:2015 certified; Enago Lock adds file protection.

What users say

Feedback is mixed: company testimonials and some reviewers praise editing quality, while Trustpilot, Glassdoor, and Reddit threads carry notable complaints.

“Enago edited my text and…”
Trustpilot reviewer

Alternatives

Compare Enago with each alternative.

  • Wordvice

    Direct rival; comparison posts weigh it on price

    Enago vs Wordvice
  • AJE

    Rival editing and publication support for researchers

    Enago vs AJE
  • Editage (CACTUS)

    Large competitor editing service, similar model

  • Trinka

    Cheaper AI grammar and academic tone checker

Companies that use it

  • University of Toronto Press
  • EIFL
  • Altum
  • Silverchair
  • Turnitin
Full analysis

Based on 30+ public sources; snippets truncated, so detail is limited

Legit academic editing with per-word pricing; great for journal-bound researchers, overkill for casual proofreading.

Methodology

Based on 30+ public sources; snippets truncated, so detail is limited

Read how a report is made.

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. review
  5. review
  6. review
  7. review
  8. official
  9. official
  10. security
  11. news

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.