shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Should I use eSkill?

Pre-employment testing and skills assessment platform - eskill.com

Depends. Buy if you're an HR, staffing, or high-volume hiring team screening many candidates on office skills. Skip it if you're a small team, need transparent pricing, or are hiring engineers — reviewers say it's weak there.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 25+ public sources; many review snippets were truncated.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo direct support evidence found
  • Security posture

Pricing

Contact sales

Subscription (quote-based)

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed

Best for

  • Mid-size and enterprise HR teams
  • High-volume hiring (staffing, BPO)
  • Regulated industries needing compliance tests
  • Screening office skills like typing and customer service

Not for

  • Small teams hiring a few people a year — overkill
  • Engineering and developer hiring — reviewers say it's weak there
  • Anyone wanting self-serve, transparent pricing
  • Startups expecting a free tier or quick signup

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

Quote-only pricing means a sales call before you know the cost

medium

Pay-per-test sold in blocks; overage and expiry terms unclear until contract

medium

Test answers circulate online; verify proctoring settings before high-stakes testing

low

Acquired by Scaleworks in 2024; roadmap and support experience may shift

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Thousands of organizations use it, with 368 reviews on G2
  • Large test library spanning IT, finance, government, and customer service
  • Proctoring and anti-cheat tooling included for test integrity
  • Case studies report 75% faster candidate screening, 50% faster time-to-hire
  • Positive sentiment across G2, Capterra, and Software Advice reviews

Cons

  • Quote-only pricing; no public prices anywhere
  • Reviewers say solid for HR, weak for engineers
  • Test answers circulate online; cheating is a discussed concern
  • Third-party security posture rated D (33/100)

Sources & method

Analyzed 10/02/2026 - 9 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. Third-party posture grade: D (33/100).

official x3review x3security x1news x2
  • Third-party security posture grade D, saasposture scores 33/100, citing limited public security transparency.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 3/5

    Rating

  • Not disclosed

    Starting price

  • 9

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 3/5. Quote-only pricing; pay-per-test blocks
  • Ease of use: 4/5. Reviewers praise scoring and usability
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Huge library across many role types
  • Support quality. No direct support evidence found
  • Security posture: 3/5. No known CVEs, but weak posture grade
  • 368 G2 reviews eSkill Corporation seller profile
  • Quote-only Starting price No public pricing
  • $12M Annual revenue Owler estimate
  • 2024 Acquired By Scaleworks, new CEO appointed

Pricing

Subscription (quote-based)

Not disclosed

  • Quote-only plans, e.g. Growth tier
  • Pay-per-test blocks also available

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

  • Third-party security posture grade Dsaasposture scores 33/100, citing limited public security transparency.⁷

Third-party posture grade: D (33/100).

What users say

Review sentiment is broadly positive on scoring and usability, with recurring gripes about opaque pricing and weaker technical assessments.

“I would definitely recommend”
G2 review
“I just took the eSkill Typing Test”
Reddit, r/jobs

Alternatives

Compare eSkill with each alternative.

  • TestGorilla

    Free plan; strong general pre-employment testing

  • iMocha

    Broader tech skills assessments for technical hiring

  • Mercer Mettl

    Enterprise-grade assessment suite, big-org oriented

    eSkill vs Mercer Mettl

Companies that use it

  • TaskUs
  • BELAY⁹
  • BenefitMall
  • Chemonics
  • Prince George's County Schools
Full analysis

Based on 25+ public sources; many review snippets were truncated.

Battle-tested skills testing for high-volume HR hiring; opaque quote-only pricing and weak tech tests make it a pass for small teams.

Methodology

Based on 25+ public sources; many review snippets were truncated.

Sources

  1. official
  2. review
  3. review
  4. review
  5. official
  6. news
  7. security
  8. news
  9. BELAY case studycasestudies.com
    official

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.