shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Should I use Expo?

Build native apps with React - expo.dev

Worth it. If you're building a React Native app, buy it — it's the de facto standard and the core is free. Skip it if you're not doing mobile development or need heavy day-one native customization and careful billing oversight.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~30 public sources; snippets truncated and several G2/Facebook 'Expo' results refer to unrelated businesses.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

$0

Free

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes
ProductionGuess: ~$99/mo
EnterpriseCustom

Best for

  • React Native app teams
  • Solo devs shipping iOS + Android fast
  • Startups without mobile CI infrastructure
  • Teams wanting OTA updates

Not for

  • Web-only or backend projects — no mobile app, no reason
  • Native-first teams needing heavy custom Swift/Kotlin from day one
  • Buyers expecting responsive billing support (see cancellation complaint)
  • Flutter or non-React-Native stacks

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

Billing trap: one user charged $158 after canceling; says support emails went unanswered.

medium

EAS plans cap builds and update bandwidth; heavy usage moves you to paid tiers quickly.

medium

Guess: EAS lock-in (builds, updates, submission) — migrating to self-hosted CI takes real work.

low

Paid EAS is easy to conflate with the free framework; Reddit threads show pricing confusion.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Expo claims 80% of React Native developers use it — de facto standard.
  • Core framework is open-source and free; paid EAS services are optional.
  • G2 reviewers say Expo eliminates the hardest parts of mobile development.
  • Active community help via GitHub discussions, Stack Overflow, and Reddit.
  • Well-funded: $45M Series B (April 2026); shipping new AI tooling (Expo Agent).

Cons

  • 2023 OAuth vulnerability in Expo SDK enabled account takeovers; since remediated.
  • Newer CVEs in optional modules, e.g. expo-share-intent path traversal (2026).
  • One user reports $158 charged after canceling; billing complaint published.
  • EAS usage limits push costs up as builds and update bandwidth scale.
  • Thin formal review coverage — only 4 G2 reviews for products.

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/30/2026 - 12 sources - Past account-takeover flaws (2023) were remediated; newer CVEs hit optional modules; a security & compliance page is published.

official x3review x5security x3news x1
  • CVE-2023-28131 — Expo SDK OAuth vulnerability, OAuth flaw in the widely used Expo framework allowed account takeovers; disclosed and remediated in 2023.
  • Salt Security API flaws (2023), API vulnerabilities risked account takeover and PII/credit-card exposure across online services; issues were remediated.
  • CVE-2026-78196 — expo-share-intent path traversal, Path traversal flaw in the optional expo-share-intent module, disclosed August 2026.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 4/5

    Rating

  • $0

    Starting price

  • 12

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 4/5. Free core; you pay only when EAS scales
  • Ease of use: 4/5. Removes native build-tooling pain; beginners ship fast
  • Feature depth: 4/5. SDK, cloud builds, OTA updates, dev clients
  • Support quality: 3/5. Strong community; billing-support complaints exist
  • Security posture: 3/5. 2023 OAuth flaws fixed; newer module CVEs
  • 80% React Native adoption of RN developers, per Expo
  • $45M Series B raised April 2026
  • Yes Free tier open-source core; EAS has a free plan
  • 4.6/5 G2 rating seller rating on G2

Pricing

Free

$0

  • Open-source framework + Expo Go
  • EAS Build/Update free queue

Production

Guess: ~$99/mo

  • More builds and update bandwidth
  • Priority build queue

Enterprise

Not disclosed

  • Higher limits, compliance support
  • Third-party guides note enterprise starts higher

Security

Past account-takeover flaws (2023) were remediated; newer CVEs hit optional modules; a security & compliance page is published.

  • CVE-2023-28131 — Expo SDK OAuth vulnerabilityOAuth flaw in the widely used Expo framework allowed account takeovers; disclosed and remediated in 2023.⁹
  • Salt Security API flaws (2023)API vulnerabilities risked account takeover and PII/credit-card exposure across online services; issues were remediated.11
  • CVE-2026-78196 — expo-share-intent path traversalPath traversal flaw in the optional expo-share-intent module, disclosed August 2026.10

What users say

Reddit and app-store feedback skew positive — many treat Expo as the default way to build React Native apps — with occasional gripes about EAS pricing and a security history.

Alternatives

Compare Expo with each alternative.

  • React Native CLI (bare workflow)

    Full native control; more setup and maintenance on you.

  • Capgo

    OTA update alternative to EAS Update.

    Expo vs Capgo
  • TanayK07/expo-react-native-cicd

    Free community CI/CD template replacing paid EAS builds.

Full analysis

Based on ~30 public sources; snippets truncated and several G2/Facebook 'Expo' results refer to unrelated businesses.

Default choice for React Native apps: free open-source core, optional paid EAS. Skip if you're not building mobile apps.

Methodology

Based on ~30 public sources; snippets truncated and several G2/Facebook 'Expo' results refer to unrelated businesses.

Sources

  1. official
  2. official
  3. official
  4. news
  5. review
  6. review
  7. review
  8. review
  9. security
  10. security
  11. security
  12. review

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.