shouldiuse.io

Report

Should I Use F5, Inc.?

f5.com·Analyzed 11 hours ago··Based on 10 sources

Unified delivery & security for applications, APIs, & AI workloads across any infrastructure, trusted by 85% of the Fortune 500. Secure your digital ecosystem.

Depends

Depends

Buy only if you run complex, high-stakes apps at enterprise scale with dedicated network and security staff.

Fortune-500-grade app delivery and security — enterprise fit, expensive overkill for small teams.

Confidence: Medium

4.4/5

G2 rating

260+ reviews

85%

Fortune 500 reach

Per F5's own claim

6,500

Employees

75 offices, 43 countries

1996

Founded

Seattle, WA

Ease of use2

Guess: BIG-IP complexity; trial license friction reported

Feature depth5

Broadest delivery plus security portfolio in category

Security posture2

2025 nation-state breach; ongoing CVE advisories

Pros

  • Trusted by 85% of the Fortune 500 per F5's own marketing¹
  • Gartner MQ Leader; 4.4/5 G2 rating across 260+ reviews²
  • Covers load balancing, WAF, API, and AI security plus NGINX¹
  • Consumable on-demand via AWS Marketplace pay-as-you-go Virtual Edition
  • 30 years in market; ~6,500 employees across 43 countries10

Cons

  • Nation-state breach stole BIG-IP source code, disclosed October 2025
  • No public pricing; quote-based enterprise sales process
  • Steady CVE stream (HTTP/2, NGINX Agent) demands patch ops
  • Trial licenses reportedly hard to obtain for evaluation
  • NGINX community forked after F5 acquisition

Gotchas

  • highNation-state actors (UNC5221) stole BIG-IP source code; CISA issued emergency directive ED 26-01.
  • high2025 supply-chain hack reportedly endangered 600,000+ internet-connected devices.
  • mediumSubscription VE licensing is self-serve, but enterprise deals stay opaque until quoted.
  • lowQuarterly plus out-of-band security notifications; budget patch windows for BIG-IP and NGINX.

Best for

  • Large enterprises with dedicated NetSec teams
  • Regulated industries like banking
  • Hybrid multicloud app estates
  • Consolidating WAF + API security

Not for

  • Startups and small teams needing simple load balancing
  • Anyone without BIG-IP-trained admins
  • Simple sites wanting CDN or basic WAF
  • Buyers wanting transparent self-serve pricing

Companies that use it

  • University of Derby
  • Paciolan
  • Mirai

Pricing

BIG-IP VE (AWS)

Pay-as-you-go, hourly

  • 10Gbps Virtual Edition on AWS Marketplace
  • PAYG billing

BIG-IP VE Subscription

Quote-based

  • Self-license VEs on-demand
  • Enterprise sales negotiation

Trial license

Free

  • LTM VM trial
  • Approval reportedly slow

Security

High-risk: nation-state breach disclosed Oct 2025; steady CVE advisory stream since.

  • Nation-state breach (disclosed Oct 2025)UNC5221 stole BIG-IP source code and vulnerability data; CISA directive followed; F5 filed SEC 8-K.
  • BIG-IP HTTP/2 vulnerability CVE-2026-59762Security advisory for HTTP/2 flaw in BIG-IP.
  • NGINX Agent vulnerabilityOut-of-band security notification for NGINX Agent CVE.

What users say

Direct user reviews are scarce in public sources; employee sentiment is 77% positive across 175 reviews, while Reddit threads cite trial-licensing friction and breach fallout.

Alternatives

Compare F5, Inc. with each alternative.

AWS Elastic Load Balancing

Managed cloud load balancing; skip BIG-IP if AWS-native

Cloudflare

CDN, WAF, and DDoS protection without appliance overhead

Full analysis

Based on ~20 public sources: SEC filings, F5 KB advisories, vendor comparisons, Reddit, and employee reviews.

Sources

  1. official
  2. review
  3. security
  4. security
  5. news
  6. official
  7. official
  8. review
  9. review
  10. official

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Ask a follow-up

Ask if a use case fits. Answers stay inside this report and its sources.

    Comments

    One queue. No replies. Give a display name first. Limit: 7 comments per day.

    Save a name to write a comment.

    No comments yet.