shouldiuse.io

VERDICT

Should I use Fab?

Not disclosed - fab.com

Depends. Reasonable for Unreal Engine devs buying assets cheaply who expect little support. Avoid if you depend on refunds, seller reliability, or procurement-grade vendor documentation.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~10 usable public sources; many 'Fab' search hits were unrelated companies (bank, TCG, bipods) and were excluded.

Ratings

  • Value for moneyNo direct evidence on price-vs-value
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security postureNo security page found; no findings either way

Pricing

Pay-per-item

$0 and up (most prices end .99)

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes

Best for

  • Unreal Engine developers
  • Game studios buying 3D, VFX, audio
  • Indie creators wanting free starter assets

Not for

  • Buyers needing reliable refunds or support
  • Non-Epic engine teams needing portable assets
  • Enterprises requiring vendor security documentation
  • Anyone wanting hand-curated, quality-vetted listings

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Refund path is weak: one buyer spent £202.41 and hit a support wall

medium

Two different license types exist; pick the wrong one and usage rights break

medium

Seller-side complaints about payouts and process; vet sellers before large purchases

low

Guess: assets often require Epic tooling (UE, Twinmotion) to open; migration out is manual

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Enormous consolidated catalog of game assets, VFX, audio, and tools
  • Free items available; paid prices typically end in .99
  • Built-in buyer review system on listings
  • Epic reports Fab tripled activity in its 2025 Year in Review

Cons

  • Documented support nightmare; buyer paid £202.41 and got stuck
  • Users call it the worst marketplace they've used
  • Reviewed as a disaster for both customers and sellers
  • Refund and seller-process complaints recur across forums

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/20/2026 - 10 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x3review x4security x1news x2

Key stats

  • Ease of use: 2/5

    Rating

  • $0 and up (most prices end .99)

    Starting price

  • 10

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money. No direct evidence on price-vs-value
  • Ease of use: 2/5. Users call it the worst marketplace they've used
  • Feature depth: 3/5. Reviews system, license tiers, growing catalog
  • Support quality: 1/5. Support nightmare threads; paid buyers left stuck
  • Security posture. No security page found; no findings either way
  • $0 Starting price Free items exist; paid prices end in .99
  • Yes Free tier $0 assets available on listings
  • Oct 2024 Marketplace relaunched Replaced Unreal Engine Marketplace

Pricing

Pay-per-item

$0 and up (most prices end .99)

  • One-time purchase per asset
  • Standard and extended license options
  • Free asset section available

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

Full analysis

Based on ~10 usable public sources; many 'Fab' search hits were unrelated companies (bank, TCG, bipods) and were excluded.

Epic's mega asset store: huge catalog, free items, but loud support and refund complaints. Fine for cheap buys; don't rely on help.

Methodology

Based on ~10 usable public sources; many 'Fab' search hits were unrelated companies (bank, TCG, bipods) and were excluded.

Sources

  1. official
  2. official
  3. Reviews in Fabdev.epicgames.com
    official
  4. review
  5. review
  6. review
  7. Fab 2025 Year in Reviewunrealengine.com
    news
  8. review
  9. security
  10. news

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.