shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Should I use FactSet?

Financial data, market analytics & AI solutions for the investment industry - factset.com

Depends. Buy only if you're an institutional finance team (asset management, banking, PE) that needs deep market data and can absorb negotiated per-seat contracts. Individuals and small teams should skip it — cheaper tools cover the basics.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 25+ public sources; many review snippets were truncated and no hard price figures were published.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo usable evidence
  • Security posture

Pricing

Custom (negotiated)

Enterprise Workstation

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed

Best for

  • Buy-side analysts and asset managers
  • Investment banks and PE firms
  • Fixed-income and risk teams
  • Enterprises consolidating market-data vendors

Not for

  • Individual or retail investors
  • Startups and small teams
  • Anyone wanting self-serve, transparent pricing
  • Casual screening — use Koyfin or TradingView

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

Expect a sales cycle and annual enterprise agreement, not checkout pricing

medium

Guess: seat-based costs scale fast; Reddit users seek cheaper substitutes

low

Koyfin markets itself as the cheaper FactSet alternative — expect price pressure

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Serves 9,100+ financial firms
  • G2 Fall 2026 Leader badge
  • Broad API catalog for data integration
  • Helped Aon consolidate its market-data platform
  • Investors cite a strong data moat

Cons

  • Bills via negotiated contracts; no transparent pricing
  • Mainly enterprise; poor fit for individuals
  • Reddit sentiment harsh — 'FactSet is terrible' threads exist
  • Users actively hunt cheaper alternatives

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/25/2026 - 18 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x4review x9security x2news x3

Key stats

  • Value for money: 2/5

    Rating

  • Not disclosed

    Starting price

  • 18

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 2/5. Negotiated contracts; users hunt cheaper alternatives
  • Ease of use: 3/5. Reddit: 'ok at the basics'
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Deep data, broad APIs, G2 Leader badge
  • Support quality. No usable evidence
  • Security posture: 4/5. PSIRT, security center, third-party rating; no incidents
  • 9,100+ Client firms financial firms served
  • 4,501 Companies tracked using it per TheirStack data
  • Custom Pricing negotiated; no public list price
  • 3.6/5 Employer rating AmbitionBox, 1,800+ employee reviews

Pricing

Enterprise Workstation

Not disclosed

  • Financial data, analytics, and APIs
  • Contracts negotiated annually via sales

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

Alternatives

Compare FactSet with each alternative.

  • AlphaSense

    Enterprise market-intelligence and search alternative

Companies that use it

  • Aon15
  • Barclays14
  • State Street
  • Portfolio Vault
Full analysis

Based on 25+ public sources; many review snippets were truncated and no hard price figures were published.

Enterprise financial-data platform for institutions; negotiated pricing. Overkill for individuals and small teams.

Methodology

Based on 25+ public sources; many review snippets were truncated and no hard price figures were published.

Sources

  1. FactSet homepagefactset.com
    official
  2. official
  3. official
  4. review
  5. review
  6. review
  7. review
  8. review
  9. review
  10. review
  11. review
  12. review
  13. news
  14. news
  15. Aon case studyfactset.com
    official
  16. news
  17. security
  18. FactSet PSIRTfactset.com
    security

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.