shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Should I use First Advantage (FADV)?

Global background checks & screening for confident hiring - fadv.com

Depends. Buy if you're a large or high-volume employer needing global, compliant screening with ATS integration. Skip it if you're a small team or startup wanting transparent pricing and fast, self-serve checks.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 30+ public sources; several review snippets truncated, limiting verbatim quotes.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

Varies by check complexity

Custom quote

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed

Best for

  • High-volume enterprise hiring
  • Multi-country screening programs
  • Regulated industries (healthcare, transport)
  • Staffing agencies needing ATS integration

Not for

  • Small teams running occasional checks — expect enterprise friction
  • Startups wanting transparent, self-serve pricing
  • Anyone needing instant, same-day checks
  • Candidates — you don't choose your employer's screener

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Slow turnarounds delay start dates; Reddit threads document multi-week candidate waits

medium

Per-check pricing varies by complexity; international searches and verifications add cost fast

medium

Disputing report errors is a formal process that can drag on

medium

Phishing scams pose as FADV; candidates should verify email legitimacy before responding

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Global background checks, drug screening, and identity verification in one platform
  • Acquired Sterling Check for $2.2B, deepening scale and global coverage
  • Integrates with ATSs like Bullhorn for pre-to-post-hire screening
  • Runs a public Trust Center with security and compliance documentation
  • Dedicated small-business background check offering exists

Cons

  • Candidates widely report slow turnarounds — checks stuck for weeks
  • No public pricing; every quote depends on check complexity
  • Report errors and failed checks trigger complaint-heavy dispute processes
  • Trustpilot reviews skew negative on customer service
  • Scammers impersonate FADV emails, eroding candidate trust

Sources & method

Analyzed 10/01/2026 - 14 sources - Trust Center published and SSL tested; one data-breach lawsuit investigation reported (April 2026); phishing impersonation reported.

official x5review x5security x2news x2
  • Data breach lawsuit investigation, A law firm opened an investigation into a reported First Advantage data breach as of April 2026; sources do not confirm a breach.
  • Phishing impersonation, Scam emails impersonating First Advantage reported in candidate Facebook groups; the company says it will never ask candidates for certain info.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 2/5

    Rating

  • Varies by check complexity

    Starting price

  • 14

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 2/5. Quote-based; no published rates to benchmark.
  • Ease of use: 2/5. Candidates report slow, confusing check processes.
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Broad: global checks, identity, fingerprinting, drug screening.
  • Support quality: 2/5. Trustpilot and dispute complaints dominate feedback.
  • Security posture: 3/5. Trust Center published; breach lawsuit investigation reported.
  • 114 G2 reviews across First Advantage products
  • $2.2B Sterling acquisition completed Oct 31, 2024
  • None Public pricing quote-based, varies by check complexity
  • Largest claim Market position self-described largest background screening firm

Pricing

Custom quote

Varies by check complexity

  • Per-check pricing by package and complexity
  • No public rate card
  • Quotes via sales contact

Security

Trust Center published and SSL tested; one data-breach lawsuit investigation reported (April 2026); phishing impersonation reported.

  • Data breach lawsuit investigationA law firm opened an investigation into a reported First Advantage data breach as of April 2026; sources do not confirm a breach.10
  • Phishing impersonationScam emails impersonating First Advantage reported in candidate Facebook groups; the company says it will never ask candidates for certain info.

What users say

Employers cite scale and compliance breadth, but candidates frequently complain about slow turnarounds and painful dispute processes.

Companies that use it

  • AT&T
  • Compass Group
  • Liveops
Full analysis

Based on 30+ public sources; several review snippets truncated, limiting verbatim quotes.

Enterprise screening, strong global scale, but slow turnarounds and opaque pricing. Small teams: look elsewhere.

Methodology

Based on 30+ public sources; several review snippets truncated, limiting verbatim quotes.

Sources

  1. First Advantage: Global Background Checks & Screeningsfadv.com
    official
  2. Trusted Background Checks for Confident Hiringfadv.com
    official
  3. First Advantage Completes Acquisition of Sterling Check for $2.2 Billioninvestors.fadv.com
    news
  4. How much does a First Advantage background check cost?care.fadv.com
    official
  5. First Advantage Reviews | Trustpilottrustpilot.com
    review
  6. First Advantage Reviews & Product Details | G2g2.com
    review
  7. First Advantage Background Check is taking ages | Redditreddit.com
    review
  8. First Advantage Background Check | Reddit r/recruitinghellreddit.com
    review
  9. First Advantage Dispute: Failed Background Check & Errorsconsumerattorneys.com
    news
  10. First Advantage Data Breach Lawsuit (April 2026)dapeer.com
    security
  11. First Advantage Customer Trust Centertrust.fadv.com
    security
  12. First Advantage | Bullhorn Marketplacebullhorn.com
    official
  13. Compare First Advantage vs. OnGridslashdot.org
    review
  14. Small Business Background Checks | FADVfadv.com
    official

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.