Per-minute usage
Pricing model
Billed on usage, not assets
Report
One video API and SDKs to ship video in a weekend: encoding, streaming, AI, search, analytics, playout, and agents. Transparent per-minute pricing.
Depends
DependsBuy if your dev team is shipping OTT, UGC, or AI-heavy video and wants usage-based pricing with real SDKs.
Dev-friendly video API with fair usage pricing — but an unverified breach report and unproven company should give enterprises pause.
Per-minute usage
Pricing model
Billed on usage, not assets
$600
Startup credits
Free credits via startup program
3 tiers
Plans
Three media-quality tiers, Standard and up
None disclosed
Funding
Tracxn lists no raised rounds
Redditors report 'a few dollars' total; cheaper than Vimeo claim
Python, Go, .NET SDKs; devs report smooth integration
Encoding, streaming, AI, analytics, playout in one API
G2 users praise exceptional customer support
Unverified 119k-user breach report; related domain flagged
Per-minute, pay-as-you-go
$600 credits
Trust Center and DRM/JWT docs exist, but an unverified report claims a breach exposing ~119,000 users; a related domain is flagged by some vendors.
Developers on G2 and Reddit praise affordability, support, and quick integration; security chatter is the main negative.
“With FastPix, I ended up spending just a few dollars”
“You might want to check out FastPix.”
Compare FastPix with each alternative.
Dev-first video API with strong analytics; more mature player.
FastPix vs MuxSimple, predictable pricing for hosting and streaming.
Video API built for fast developer onboarding.
FastPix vs api.videoEnterprise-grade encoding and streaming; pricier, proven.
FastPix vs BitmovinBased on ~25 public sources; small review base and the breach report is unverified.
Anonymous. You can change your vote.
Loading votes…
Ask if a use case fits. Answers stay inside this report and its sources.
Comments
One queue. No replies. Give a display name first. Limit: 7 comments per day.
No comments yet.