shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Should I use Fatjoe?

The smarter way to get SEO done — outsourced link building, content, and digital PR - fatjoe.com

Depends. Buy if you're an agency reselling white-label outreach at volume and you test link quality small first. Skip it if you want strategic in-house SEO, guaranteed rankings, or you're uneasy about paid-link risk.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~25 public sources; exact pricing tiers not listed in reviewed pages, so no pricing numbers are asserted.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo direct evidence reviewed
  • Security posture

Pricing

Not disclosed

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed

Best for

  • Agencies white-labeling link building
  • SEO teams buying outreach links at volume
  • Done-for-you digital PR buyers

Not for

  • Brands wanting strategic, in-house SEO
  • Buyers needing guaranteed rankings or traffic
  • Teams uneasy with Google paid-link penalty risk
  • One-off premium link shoppers on small budgets

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Black-hat debate is real; Google penalty risk sits with you

medium

Pricing scales with DR; reviewers say low-DR links are poor value

medium

One reviewer says money was wasted before results; test small first

low

G2 sample is tiny (8 reviews) and mixed; hard to judge quality

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Broad catalog: outreach, content, digital PR, community mentions
  • Self-serve ordering with no sales calls
  • White-label friendly for agencies
  • Scaled operation, ~$7.3M estimated ARR

Cons

  • 3.8/5 G2 rating from just 8 reviews
  • Buyers openly debate black-hat status of links
  • Low-DR links called poor value vs alternatives
  • Some buyers report wasted spend

Sources & method

Analyzed 10/01/2026 - 12 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x1review x9security x1news x1

Key stats

  • Value for money: 3/5

    Rating

  • Not disclosed

    Starting price

  • 12

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 3/5. Cheap low-DR links; value contested by reviewers
  • Ease of use: 4/5. Self-serve ordering, no sales calls
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Outreach, content, digital PR, forum mentions
  • Support quality. No direct evidence reviewed
  • Security posture: 3/5. Security page published; site scan scored 59/100
  • 3.8/5 G2 rating 8 reviews
  • $7.3M ARR Estimated revenue GetLatka, 2025
  • 59/100 Website grade Foglift scan

Pricing

Not disclosed

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

Reviews are mixed: buyers like the convenience and scale, but G2 averages 3.8/5 and some report poor value on cheaper links.

Companies that use it

  • Wolf River Electric
Full analysis

Based on ~25 public sources; exact pricing tiers not listed in reviewed pages, so no pricing numbers are asserted.

Link-building marketplace for agencies; G2 just 3.8/5. Fine for outsourced outreach, not for strategic SEO.

Methodology

Based on ~25 public sources; exact pricing tiers not listed in reviewed pages, so no pricing numbers are asserted.

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. news
  4. review
  5. review
  6. review
  7. review
  8. review
  9. review
  10. review
  11. official
  12. security

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.