shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Should I use Assembla?

Managed cloud hosting for Perforce, SVN & Git with project management - get.assembla.com

Depends. Buy if you need managed SVN or Perforce hosting with SOC 2 compliance — game studios and regulated shops fit best. Git-first startups, solo devs, and cost-sensitive teams should use GitHub or GitLab instead.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~40 public sources; most snippets truncated, so details are partial.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of useNo dimension-level evidence found
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo support evidence found
  • Security posture

Pricing

$10.35/user/month

Assembla Cloud

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes
Perforce Enterprise CloudCustom quote

Best for

  • Game studios needing managed Perforce
  • Teams stuck on SVN
  • Compliance-driven shops wanting SOC 2
  • Agencies outsourcing repo hosting

Not for

  • Git-first startups — GitHub/GitLab are stronger and cheaper
  • Solo devs and hobby projects — free GitHub does more
  • Small teams wanting modern CI/CD ecosystems
  • Anyone avoiding per-user pricing creep

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Per-user model scales badly; some plans cited at $45/user/month.

medium

Six pricing editions listed on G2; verify which features sit in which tier.

medium

Free tier limited to small-scale projects; check size limits first.

medium

Jenkins plugin had 2026 CVEs (CSRF, XXE); patch integrations promptly.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Managed Git, SVN, and Perforce hosting under one roof.
  • SOC 2, GDPR, AES-256 claims for compliance-heavy buyers.
  • Rated 4.2/5 across 149 G2 reviews.
  • Task management bundled with version control hosting.
  • Game-studio case studies: Two Point Studios, Made with Unity.

Cons

  • Niche value: GitHub outclasses it for Git-first teams.
  • Per-user pricing climbs; Reddit cites $45/user/month on some plans.
  • Small vendor; third-party trackers note flat growth.

Sources & method

Analyzed 10/03/2026 - 14 sources - Official SOC 2/GDPR/AES-256 claims; 2026 CVEs found in the Jenkins plugin; one historical session-takeover exploit report.

official x5review x5security x3news x1
  • CVE-2026-57305: Jenkins Assembla Plugin CSRF vulnerability, Cross-site request forgery in the Jenkins Assembla plugin, version 1.4 and earlier. Affects the CI integration, not the core platform.
  • CVE-2026-57303: Jenkins Assembla Plugin XXE vulnerability, XML external entity vulnerability in the Jenkins Assembla plugin disclosed September 2026.
  • Historical session takeover exploit report, A researcher publicly reported a session takeover exploit in Assembla on Medium.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 3/5

    Rating

  • $10.35/user/month

    Starting price

  • 14

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 3/5. Cheap entry tier; per-user costs climb fast
  • Ease of use. No dimension-level evidence found
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Git, SVN, Perforce plus task management
  • Support quality. No support evidence found
  • Security posture: 3/5. SOC 2 claims; plugin CVEs and old exploit
  • 4.2/5 G2 rating 149 reviews
  • $10.35/user/mo Starting price Assembla Cloud (Git/SVN)
  • Yes Free tier Small-scale projects only
  • $10.8M ARR (2018) Raised just $375K

Pricing

Assembla Cloud

$10.35/user/month

  • Managed Git & SVN hosting
  • Git LFS with no separate charge
  • Includes project management

Perforce Enterprise Cloud

Not disclosed

  • Managed Helix Core (Perforce) hosting
  • Assembla manages server operations

Security

Official SOC 2/GDPR/AES-256 claims; 2026 CVEs found in the Jenkins plugin; one historical session-takeover exploit report.

  • CVE-2026-57305: Jenkins Assembla Plugin CSRF vulnerabilityCross-site request forgery in the Jenkins Assembla plugin, version 1.4 and earlier. Affects the CI integration, not the core platform.⁹
  • CVE-2026-57303: Jenkins Assembla Plugin XXE vulnerabilityXML external entity vulnerability in the Jenkins Assembla plugin disclosed September 2026.10
  • Historical session takeover exploit reportA researcher publicly reported a session takeover exploit in Assembla on Medium.11

What users say

Game studios and SVN/Perforce shops rate it well (4.2/5 on G2 across 149 reviews), with gripes mostly about per-user pricing.

“Basically, we live on Assembla & Sl…”
Reddit, r/ProgrammerHumor
“I'm loving Assembla”
Reddit, r/business
“Assembla offers free small-scale pr…”
Reddit, r/gamedev

Companies that use it

  • Two Point Studios⁸
  • Made with Unity
  • Blue Rocket
Full analysis

Based on ~40 public sources; most snippets truncated, so details are partial.

Managed SVN/Perforce hosting niche: great for game studios and compliance shops; Git-first teams should just use GitHub.

Methodology

Based on ~40 public sources; most snippets truncated, so details are partial.

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. official
  5. official
  6. official
  7. official
  8. official
  9. security
  10. security
  11. security
  12. review
  13. news
  14. review

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.