shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Should I use Gimp?

Trending - gimp.en.uptodown.com

Worth it. Buy if you need a capable image editor for $0 and can tolerate a dated, clunky interface. Skip it if you need polished UX, team collaboration, or vendor support.

Confidence

High. Based on ~20 public sources (reviews, forums, CVE databases); many snippets truncated.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

$0 forever

GIMP

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes

Best for

  • Hobbyists and students on a $0 budget
  • Linux and open-source users
  • Offline photo retouching without subscriptions
  • Users wary of vendor lock-in

Not for

  • Photoshop users expecting a familiar, polished workflow
  • Teams needing real-time cloud collaboration
  • Anyone wanting official vendor support or SLAs
  • Agencies needing accountable, contracted software

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Keep updated: 2026 brought multiple information-disclosure CVEs

high

PCWorld warned avoiding one file type until a flaw was fixed

medium

Free means no SLA, refunds, or vendor accountability when things break

medium

Guess: download from only; third-party mirrors risk tampered builds

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Totally free, no subscriptions or paywalls
  • Full-featured Photoshop replacement for most editing
  • GIMP 3.0 called a solid, dependable update
  • 4.3/5 across 1,485 G2 reviews
  • Community-developed, runs offline, no vendor lock-in

Cons

  • Interface widely criticized as clunky and dated
  • Steep learning curve versus Photoshop
  • Recurring security flaws; one required avoiding a file type
  • No official support; you depend on forums
  • Some free rivals feel more polished; users switched away

Sources & method

Analyzed 10/01/2026 - 10 sources - Community-developed software with several CVEs, including 2026 information-disclosure flaws; patch promptly.

official x2review x5security x2news x1
  • CVE-2026-66759, GIMP information disclosure vulnerability disclosed July 2026.
  • CVE-2026-40916, Flaw in GIMP tracked by Red Hat, April 2026.
  • Malicious file-type flaw (2025), PCWorld advised avoiding opening one file type until fixed.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 5/5

    Rating

  • $0 forever

    Starting price

  • 10

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 5/5. Completely free, no tiers
  • Ease of use: 2/5. UI widely panned as dated
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Full-featured Photoshop replacement
  • Support quality: 2/5. Community forums only, no vendor
  • Security posture: 2/5. Multiple recent CVEs, info disclosure
  • 4.3/5 G2 rating 1,485 reviews
  • $0 Price Free & open source
  • Yes Free tier 100% free, no paid plans
  • $0 Venture funding Never taken VC money; donation-funded

Pricing

GIMP

$0 forever

  • Full image editor, no limits
  • GPL open source
  • No ads or paywalls

Security

Community-developed software with several CVEs, including 2026 information-disclosure flaws; patch promptly.

  • CVE-2026-66759GIMP information disclosure vulnerability disclosed July 2026.⁷
  • CVE-2026-40916Flaw in GIMP tracked by Red Hat, April 2026.
  • Malicious file-type flaw (2025)PCWorld advised avoiding opening one file type until fixed.⁶

What users say

Users praise the price and power but consistently knock the dated, confusing interface.

“GIMP is Awesome!”
Reddit, r/DigitalArt
“GIMP is falling behind.. Where is the UX?”
PIXLS.US forum
“Photoshop users would never feel comfortable”
Reddit, r/GIMP

Alternatives

Compare Gimp with each alternative.

Full analysis

Based on ~20 public sources (reviews, forums, CVE databases); many snippets truncated.

Free Photoshop-grade editing if you'll fight a clunky UI; unbeatable price, but pros may want polish.

Methodology

Based on ~20 public sources (reviews, forums, CVE databases); many snippets truncated.

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. review
  5. review
  6. security
  7. security
  8. official
  9. official
  10. news

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.