shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Gitea Review

Depends

Should I use Gitea?

Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service: Git hosting, code review, collaboration, package registry, CI/CD - gitea.io

· 1 month ago

Buy if your team wants a free, self-hosted GitHub-style forge and can run and patch a server yourself. Skip it if you want zero-maintenance managed hosting, vendor SLAs, or are uneasy about the 2022 governance split that spawned the Forgejo fork.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~8 public sources; mostly Gitea's own pages plus Wikipedia. No independent reviews or ratings found.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo support evidence in sources
  • Security posture

Pricing

Free

Self-hosted

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes
Gitea Cloud30-day free trial; paid price not published

Best for

  • Self-hosting dev teams
  • Cost-conscious startups
  • Orgs needing code/data control
  • GitHub Actions users wanting on-prem CI

Not for

  • Teams wanting zero-maintenance managed hosting
  • Enterprises needing vendor SLAs and dedicated support
  • Buyers wary of fork or governance risk
  • Non-technical teams — this is developer tooling

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

2022 governance split: company formed, Codeberg forked to Forgejo; fork risk persists

medium

No cloud pricing published in sources; expect sales contact after the 30-day trial

medium

SSO and audit logs gated behind paid tier — compliance teams should check first

medium

Self-hosting puts CVE patching on your ops team, not the vendor

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Free and open source under MIT license
  • All-in-one: Git hosting, issues, code review, kanban, wiki, CI/CD
  • 20+ package registry formats, Cargo to RubyGems
  • Runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD, OpenBSD
  • Gitea Actions is GitHub Actions-compatible

Cons

  • Gitea Limited sells closed-source cloud; community forked to Forgejo
  • Self-hosting means you own upgrades, backups, and patching
  • Enterprise features (SAML SSO, audit logs) reserved for paid cloud
  • Priority security fixes limited to paying cloud customers

Sources & method

- 7 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed; vendor states all CVEs are fixed in the latest stable release.

official x5security x1news x1

Key stats

  • Value for money: 5/5

    Rating

  • Free

    Starting price

  • 7

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 5/5. Free MIT core; paid cloud optional
  • Ease of use: 4/5. Vendor claims clean, intuitive interface
  • Feature depth: 5/5. Git, review, CI, wiki, kanban, 20+ registries
  • Support quality. No support evidence in sources
  • Security posture: 3/5. CVEs occur; fixed in latest stable
  • Dec 2016 First release 1.0; fork of Gogs
  • Yes Free tier MIT-licensed self-host + 30-day cloud trial
  • 20+ Package registries Maven, NPM, PyPI, Container, Helm, more
  • GitHub Actions-compatible CI Built-in Gitea Actions

Pricing

Self-hosted

Free

  • MIT license, full core features
  • You run and patch the server

Gitea Cloud

30-day free trial; paid price not published

  • SAML SSO, audit logs, Kubernetes autoscaling runners
  • Priority security fixes
  • Discounts for nonprofits and small companies

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed; vendor states all CVEs are fixed in the latest stable release.

What users say

No independent user reviews found; all quotes in sources are vendor marketing copy.

Alternatives

Compare Gitea with each alternative.

  • Forgejo

    Community-governed Gitea fork; similar features, less vendor-control risk

    Gitea vs Forgejo
  • Gogs

    The original lightweight forge; simpler, fewer features

  • GitLab CE

    Heavier self-hosted DevOps platform; more built-in

Companies that use it

  • Codeberg²
Full analysis

Based on ~8 public sources; mostly Gitea's own pages plus Wikipedia. No independent reviews or ratings found.

Solid free self-hosted GitHub alternative; you run the server, and the paid cloud split triggered a community fork (Forgejo).

Methodology

Based on ~8 public sources; mostly Gitea's own pages plus Wikipedia. No independent reviews or ratings found.

Read how a report is made.

Sources

  1. official
  2. Gitea - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
    news
  3. About Giteaabout.gitea.com
    official
  4. Gitea Product Pageabout.gitea.com
    official
  5. Gitea Pricingabout.gitea.com
    official
  6. Gitea Securityabout.gitea.com
    security
  7. official

Add this review to your site

This check for Gitea says Depends.

Put the badge on your site.

Visitors see the independent review.

The link points here, and search engines follow it.

This is the badge visitors see on your site.

Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.