shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Great Minds | PK-12 Math and Literacy Curriculum Review

Depends

Should I use Great Minds | PK-12 Math and Literacy Curriculum?

Learn about Great Minds® PK-12 literacy and math curriculum, founded by teachers for teachers. - greatminds.org

· 1 month ago

Evidence is thin (one vendor page), so confidence is low: this is a district-scale curriculum with cited outcome studies, fit for districts with adoption and PD budgets. Tutors, homeschoolers, and small schools should skip it — sales-led, unpublished pricing, heavy adoption model.

Confidence

Low. Based on 2 public sources (one vendor marketing page, one missing security page); evidence is thin.

Ratings

  • Value for moneyNo public pricing to assess
  • Ease of useNo independent usability evidence
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security postureNo security page found

Pricing

Not disclosed

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed

Best for

  • District-wide math adoption
  • Schools targeting NAEP-style gains
  • Leaders wanting studied curricula
  • Districts with PD budgets

Not for

  • Homeschool families — classroom-scale, district-priced
  • Tutors wanting cheap self-serve lesson materials
  • Small schools without multi-year adoption budget
  • Buyers needing transparent pricing or security docs upfront

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Pricing is quote-based; expect multi-year district contracts plus professional development costs on top

medium

Adoption means retraining every teacher; switching from current materials mid-stream is disruptive

medium

Guess: multi-year curriculum contracts create lock-in; districts rarely switch mid-adoption

medium

No security page; request data-privacy and security documentation before signing

Pros and cons

Pros

  • USC study found significant math gains in North Carolina grades 3–5
  • Johns Hopkins study: significant student achievement gains at Arizona school
  • Louisiana partner districts lead NAEP math recovery
  • Complete PK–Algebra I math plus PK–12 literacy coverage

Cons

  • No published pricing; quote-based sales process
  • No security page published
  • All cited evidence is vendor-published; no independent reviews found
  • Requires whole-school adoption and teacher retraining, not incremental

Sources & method

- 2 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x1security x1

Key stats

  • Feature depth: 4/5

    Rating

  • Not disclosed

    Starting price

  • 2

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money. No public pricing to assess
  • Ease of use. No independent usability evidence
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Full PK–Algebra I math plus literacy
  • Support quality: 4/5. Districts cite strong instructional support
  • Security posture. No security page found
  • PK–Algebra I Grade coverage Math via Eureka Math²
  • 2 Independent studies cited USC (NC grades 3–5), Johns Hopkins (AZ)
  • Louisiana State partner Cited in NAEP math recovery
  • Math + literacy Subjects PK–12 curriculum vendor

Pricing

Not disclosed

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

No independent reviews found; evidence is limited to vendor case studies (Louisiana, Arizona, North Carolina) and one site testimonial.

Alternatives

Compare Great Minds | PK-12 Math and Literacy Curriculum with each alternative.

  • IXL

    Cheap per-student skills practice without a full adoption.

Full analysis

Based on 2 public sources (one vendor marketing page, one missing security page); evidence is thin.

District-scale PK–12 curriculum with real outcome studies — overkill for tutors, homeschools, and small schools.

Methodology

Based on 2 public sources (one vendor marketing page, one missing security page); evidence is thin.

Read how a report is made.

Sources

  1. official
  2. Security pagegreatminds.org
    security

Add this review to your site

This check for Great Minds | PK-12 Math and Literacy Curriculum says Depends.

Put the badge on your site.

Visitors see the independent review.

The link points here, and search engines follow it.

This is the badge visitors see on your site.

Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.