shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy Review

Worth it

Should I use Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy?

An encyclopedia of philosophy articles written by professional philosophers. - iep.utm.edu

· 1 month ago

Free and credible: use it for peer-reviewed philosophy background at the undergrad level. Skip it if you need exhaustive graduate depth (Stanford's encyclopedia is bigger) or don't read English.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 14 public sources: university library guides, Wikipedia, a 1999 academic review, and community discussion.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security postureNo security evidence in sources.

Pricing

$0

All content

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes

Best for

  • Undergrad philosophy students
  • Quick scholarly background reading
  • Writers needing citable overviews
  • Anyone avoiding paywalls

Not for

  • Advanced researchers — Stanford's encyclopedia is deeper and larger
  • Non-English readers — content is English-only
  • Anyone needing support, SLAs, or uptime guarantees — volunteer-run
  • Niche topic hunters — invitation-only publishing means coverage gaps

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

~900 articles with invitation-only contributions — your specific topic or philosopher may be missing.

low

No security page or funding disclosed; volunteer-run, so no uptime or support guarantees.

low

Depth targets undergrads; cross-check Stanford's encyclopedia for graduate-level work.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Completely free, open access since 1995.
  • Peer-reviewed, blind-refereed articles by professional philosophers.
  • Most-visited professionally written philosophy encyclopedia: 8.2M annual viewers.
  • Contributors from 35 countries.
  • Academic review found some entries excellent.

Cons

  • Smaller coverage than Stanford's encyclopedia (1,478 entries).
  • Contribution generally by invitation — slower topic expansion.
  • Aimed at undergrad/early-grad level, not specialists.
  • No funding — entirely volunteer-run, no support channel.
  • English-language articles only.

Sources & method

- 9 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x2review x5security x1news x1

Key stats

  • Value for money: 5/5

    Rating

  • $0

    Starting price

  • 9

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 5/5. Free peer-reviewed scholarship — unbeatable price.
  • Ease of use: 4/5. Free, browsable, pitched at undergraduates.
  • Feature depth: 3/5. ~900 articles vs Stanford's 1,478.
  • Support quality: 2/5. Volunteer-run, no funding, no support channel.
  • Security posture. No security evidence in sources.
  • Free Price No funding; all-volunteer operation
  • 8.2M Annual readers Unique viewers per 12 months
  • ~900 Article count Peer-reviewed, blind-refereed entries
  • 1995 Founded Open access since launch

Pricing

All content

$0

  • ~900 peer-reviewed articles
  • Open access, no account needed
  • No disclosed revenue or funding

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

Companies that use it

  • University of Wisconsin-Madison (library database)⁶
  • Cal State Fullerton (library guide)⁹
  • University of Chicago Library
  • University of Notre Dame Australia (library guide)
  • Harvard CHDS (repository)⁸

Companies that could

  • Stanford University⁵ Uses Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy instead
Full analysis

Based on 14 public sources: university library guides, Wikipedia, a 1999 academic review, and community discussion.

Free, peer-reviewed philosophy encyclopedia — ideal undergrad background; Stanford's is deeper for research. No cost, no catch.

Methodology

Based on 14 public sources: university library guides, Wikipedia, a 1999 academic review, and community discussion.

Read how a report is made.

Sources

  1. Review of 'The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy' (Swarthmore)works.swarthmore.edu
    review
  2. Wikipedia — Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophyen.wikipedia.org
    review
  3. IEP official siteiep.utm.edu
    official
  4. IEP security page checkiep.utm.edu
    security
  5. Stanford News on the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophynews.stanford.edu
    news
  6. UW-Madison Libraries database entrysearch.library.wisc.edu
    review
  7. Philosophy StackExchange discussionphilosophy.stackexchange.com
    review
  8. Harvard CHDS repository entryrepository.chds.hsph.harvard.edu
    official
  9. Cal State Fullerton Philosophy LibGuidelibraryguides.fullerton.edu
    review

Add this review to your site

Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy earned a Worth it check.

Put the badge on your site, pricing page, or docs.

Visitors see an independent review.

The link points here, and search engines follow it.

This is the badge visitors see on your site.

Worth it Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy Independent review on Should I Use It

Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.