shouldiuse.io

VERDICT

Should I use Lifehacker?

Lifehacker is the ultimate authority on optimizing every aspect of your life. Do everything better. - lifehacker.com

Depends. Lifehacker is a free tips publication, not software — there is nothing to buy, so casual readers lose nothing by trying it. Skip it if you need a tool to deploy or rigorous original reviews; reader sentiment is poor (Trustpilot 2.0/5).

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~20 public sources; most snippets truncated. Lifehacker is a media publication, not software, so product-fit criteria are limited.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo support evidence; media publication
  • Security posture

Pricing

$0

Free

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes

Best for

  • Casual readers wanting free how-tos
  • Deal hunters
  • Gadget shoppers wanting quick takes
  • Browsers of everyday productivity tips

Not for

  • Anyone shopping for software — this is a blog, not a tool
  • Buyers wanting rigorous, lab-tested product reviews
  • Teams evaluating productivity tools for work
  • Readers averse to ads and affiliate links

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

Articles carry 'Deal pricing and availability' affiliate disclosures; recommendations may earn commissions

medium

Gawker-era 2010 breach leaked old user passwords; assume legacy accounts compromised

low

Regional editions can vanish — Lifehacker Australia shut down in 2024

low

No dedicated security page found on the site

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Free to read, no subscription
  • Established brand, owned by Ziff Davis
  • Broad coverage: tech, money, home, entertainment
  • Long-running publication, around since 2005
  • Dedicated product reviews section

Cons

  • Trustpilot 2.0/5 from 14 reviews
  • Longtime readers say quality has declined
  • Criticized for reposting others' tips, not original work
  • Ad-heavy, cluttered design complaints from readers
  • Not software — nothing to integrate, deploy, or support

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/21/2026 - 14 sources - 2010 Gawker Media breach exposed Lifehacker user passwords; no recent incidents found in reviewed sources.

official x4review x4security x2news x4
  • Gawker Media hack (2010), Hackers breached Gawker Media servers, leaking Lifehacker commenter usernames and passwords.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 5/5

    Rating

  • $0

    Starting price

  • 14

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 5/5. Free site, no paywall in evidence
  • Ease of use: 3/5. Readers report cluttered, ad-heavy pages
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Covers tech, money, home, deals, entertainment
  • Support quality. No support evidence; media publication
  • Security posture: 2/5. 2010 breach leaked user passwords
  • 2.0/5 Trustpilot rating 14 reviews
  • $0 Price Ad-supported publication
  • Yes Free tier All content free to read
  • 2005 Founded Gawker Media; now Ziff Davis

Pricing

Free

$0

  • All articles and guides
  • Ad-supported
  • No subscription

Security

2010 Gawker Media breach exposed Lifehacker user passwords; no recent incidents found in reviewed sources.

  • Gawker Media hack (2010)Hackers breached Gawker Media servers, leaking Lifehacker commenter usernames and passwords.10

What users say

Sentiment skews negative in recent years, with loyal pre-2015 readers complaining quality, originality, and design all declined.

“Anyone else feel like LifeHacker is trash now?”
Reddit, r/LifeHacker
“Does it bother anyone that Lifehacker.com blatently steals”
Reddit, r/Frugal
“I haven't visited Lifehacker in quite a while, I don't think I'll be going ...”
Reddit, r/CrappyDesign
Full analysis

Based on ~20 public sources; most snippets truncated. Lifehacker is a media publication, not software, so product-fit criteria are limited.

Free tips blog, not software. Zero cost to try, but Trustpilot sits at 2.0/5 and readers cite declining quality.

Methodology

Based on ~20 public sources; most snippets truncated. Lifehacker is a media publication, not software, so product-fit criteria are limited.

Sources

  1. Lifehacker | Do everything betterlifehacker.com
    official
  2. Reviews | Lifehackerlifehacker.com
    official
  3. Lifehacker - Ziff Davisziffdavis.com
    official
  4. Trustpilot reviews of lifehacker.comtrustpilot.com
    review
  5. Anyone else feel like LifeHacker is trash now? - Redditreddit.com
    review
  6. Does it bother anyone that Lifehacker.com blatently steals - Redditreddit.com
    review
  7. I haven't visited Lifehacker in quite a while - Redditreddit.com
    review
  8. Lifehacker - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
    news
  9. Lifehacker - Muck Rack profilemuckrack.com
    news
  10. Lifehacker Password Hacked - Productivity501productivity501.com
    security
  11. Gawker media got hacked - Polycountpolycount.com
    security
  12. Lifehacker Australia is officially deadanguskidman.show
    news
  13. This Site Reviews Products After They Breaklifehacker.com
    official
  14. Lifehacker Alternatives: Top 12 Tech News Sitesalternativeto.net
    news

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.