shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Should I use MASV?

Large file transfer pricing for enterprise and teams - masv.io

Depends. Buy if your team regularly moves huge files — media masters, datasets, footage — and wants no per-seat fees. Skip it for everyday document sharing; any cloud drive covers that for free.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 11 public sources; most are vendor marketing, plus a few independent reviews. No review ratings found.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo evidence found
  • Security posture

Pricing

On Demand

Per-GB pay-as-you-go (reported ~$0.25/GB)

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly fees$0
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes
SubscriptionUsage-based recurring
Pre BuysPrepaid volume
EnterpriseCustom

Best for

  • Post-production and broadcast teams
  • AI and geospatial dataset ingest
  • Agencies delivering huge client files
  • Teams wanting no per-seat fees

Not for

  • Anyone sharing docs or photos — use Dropbox or Google Drive
  • Budget-heavy teams pushing 2–3+ TB monthly without an Enterprise deal
  • Buyers who need flat, predictable monthly bills
  • Small teams whose files fit in a normal cloud drive

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Reported ~$0.25/GB: costs balloon past 2–3 TB monthly; heavy users need pre-buys or Enterprise deals

medium

No seats means no flat bill — spend scales with every GB moved

medium

Free tier is just 10 GB/month; one large project blows through it

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Pay only for data moved — no seat or infrastructure fees
  • 10 GB transferred free each month
  • No file-size cap; transfers up to 5 Gbps via browser
  • Integrates S3, Dropbox, Synology, QNAP, Microsoft, Google, on-prem agent
  • Four ways to buy: On Demand, Subscription, Pre Buys, Enterprise

Cons

  • Per-GB pricing gets expensive above 2–3 TB monthly
  • Usage-based billing makes monthly costs unpredictable
  • No independent review ratings surfaced; feedback mostly vendor-driven
  • Deep MFT feature set is overkill for simple occasional sends

Sources & method

Analyzed 10/03/2026 - 11 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x6review x3security x1news x1

Key stats

  • Value for money: 3/5

    Rating

  • Per-GB pay-as-you-go (reported ~$0.25/GB)

    Starting price

  • 11

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 3/5. No seat fees; pricey past 2–3 TB/month
  • Ease of use: 4/5. Partner listings call it easiest-to-use; browser-based
  • Feature depth: 5/5. API, automations, portals, growing files, NAS and S3 integrations
  • Support quality. No evidence found
  • Security posture: 4/5. Dedicated security and governance pages; no incidents found
  • $0.25/GB Starting price reported on-demand rate
  • 10 GB/month Free tier no charge
  • 5 Gbps Transfer speed browser-based, no file-size cap
  • $0 Seat fees unlimited users, pay for data only

Pricing

On Demand

Per-GB pay-as-you-go (reported ~$0.25/GB)

  • Pay only for data moved
  • No subscription or seats

Subscription

Usage-based recurring

  • For steady transfer volume

Pre Buys

Prepaid volume

  • Buy transfer blocks upfront

Enterprise

Not disclosed

  • Custom pricing
  • Centralized governance and controls

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

Independent user feedback is sparse; the loudest third-party note is that pay-per-GB pricing gets expensive at high volumes.

“Their pricing page is titled 'Large File Transfer Pricing For Enterprise And Teams - MASV™'. Those are claims, and claims are free.”
hproxy.com blog review

Alternatives

Compare MASV with each alternative.

  • Resilio Connect

    Self-hosted P2P sync; no per-GB fees

Companies that use it

  • Miami Heat³
  • Delta Scan³
  • Troveo³
  • Intelinair³
  • Opus Agency³
Full analysis

Based on 11 public sources; most are vendor marketing, plus a few independent reviews. No review ratings found.

Usage-based large-file transfer: ideal for 100GB+ media sends, but pay-per-GB stings past 2–3TB/mo and is overkill for everyday sharing.

Methodology

Based on 11 public sources; most are vendor marketing, plus a few independent reviews. No review ratings found.

Sources

  1. official
  2. official
  3. security
  4. official
  5. official
  6. official
  7. official
  8. review
  9. review
  10. review
  11. news

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.