shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Should I use Matrix.org?

Matrix, the open protocol for secure decentralised communications - matrix.org

Depends. Buy only if you specifically need federated or self-hosted encrypted chat and can tolerate rough edges. Skip if you want polished team chat out of the box — Slack, Discord, or Signal fit better.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~30 public sources: Reddit, Hacker News, official blogs, and CVE databases.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo direct support-quality evidence found
  • Security posture

Pricing

Free

Free account

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes
PremiumSee pricing page

Best for

  • Privacy-focused communities
  • Self-hosters wanting federation
  • Open-source projects needing bridges
  • Teams that must own their data

Not for

  • Teams that just need a group chat — Discord or Signal does it with less pain
  • Non-technical users; client choice and onboarding confusion is a known complaint
  • Anyone expecting uptime guarantees or vendor SLAs from the free server
  • Buyers who can't tolerate sync bugs or room-history loss

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

bridges nearly shut down in 2025 unless $100k was raised; funding stays fragile

high

Users report corrupt-room and sync bugs severe enough to make them quit the platform

medium

Premium accounts introduced June 2025 to fund the free homeserver; sustainability uncertain

medium

Long CVE history including E2EE key-sharing bugs; patch servers and clients promptly

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Open federated protocol — choose any server or client, no single vendor owns chats
  • Free accounts on the homeserver
  • Bridges connect Discord, Slack and other networks
  • End-to-end encryption with public vulnerability disclosures
  • Wide ecosystem of clients and servers

Cons

  • Reviewers call it 'a great idea with poor execution'
  • Prominent users publicly gave up on Element and in July 2025
  • Foundation funding fragile; bridges faced shutdown without $100k
  • 89 public CVEs across Matrix components
  • Repeated reliability and data-loss complaints from long-time users

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/30/2026 - 14 sources - Active disclosure program, but heavy history: 89 tracked CVEs and a 2019 server breach. Patch fast.

official x4review x5security x4news x1
  • 2019 infrastructure breach, Attacker gained access to infrastructure; post-mortem and remediations published.
  • E2EE key-sharing vulnerabilities (CVE-2021-40823, CVE-2021-40824), Bugs in end-to-end encryption key sharing, disclosed September 2021.
  • matrix-js-sdk bug CVE-2022-39250, Vulnerability in the matrix-js-sdk tracked in the NVD.
  • Coordinated ecosystem fix, July 2025, Pre-disclosure of a coordinated security fix for all homeservers; security release followed in August 2025.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 4/5

    Rating

  • Free

    Starting price

  • 14

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 4/5. Free server and protocol; premium added to fund it
  • Ease of use: 2/5. Poor execution and onboarding confusion widely reported
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Federation, E2EE, bridges to Discord and Slack
  • Support quality. No direct support-quality evidence found
  • Security posture: 2/5. 89 CVEs, 2019 breach, though disclosure is active
  • 89 Public CVEs Tracked under the Matrix vendor
  • Yes Free tier Premium accounts added June 2025 to fund the server
  • 2014 Protocol launched Open standard, Apache-licensed spec
  • UK non-profit Operator Ran public funding appeal in Feb 2025

Pricing

Free account

Free

  • matrix.org homeserver account
  • Core federated chat features

Premium

See pricing page

  • Introduced June 2025
  • Funds matrix.org homeserver operations

Security

Active disclosure program, but heavy history: 89 tracked CVEs and a 2019 server breach.

  • 2019 infrastructure breachAttacker gained access to infrastructure; post-mortem and remediations published.10
  • E2EE key-sharing vulnerabilities (CVE-2021-40823, CVE-2021-40824)Bugs in end-to-end encryption key sharing, disclosed September 2021.11

Patch fast.

  • matrix-js-sdk bug CVE-2022-39250Vulnerability in the matrix-js-sdk tracked in the NVD.
  • Coordinated ecosystem fix, July 2025Pre-disclosure of a coordinated security fix for all homeservers; security release followed in August 2025.12

What users say

Users praise the federated vision but frequently report buggy clients, sync corruption, and publicly quit in 2025.

“Matrix is a great idea with poor execution”
Reddit, r/matrixdotorg
“I tried matrix.org and it wasn't great!”
Reddit, r/selfhosted
“Matrix is basically a case study in how not to design”
Hacker News

Alternatives

Compare Matrix.org with each alternative.

  • Signal

    Best private messaging without self-hosting hassle

  • Discord

    Polished free community chat, though centralized

  • Slack

    Standard team chat with reliable apps and support

    Matrix.org vs Slack
Full analysis

Based on ~30 public sources: Reddit, Hacker News, official blogs, and CVE databases.

Open federated chat: great idea, buggy execution. 89 CVEs, funding woes, users quitting. Worth it only for self-hosters.

Methodology

Based on ~30 public sources: Reddit, Hacker News, official blogs, and CVE databases.

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. review
  5. news
  6. official
  7. official
  8. official
  9. security
  10. security
  11. security
  12. security
  13. official
  14. Element (Matrix) reviewshortlisted.tools
    review

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.