shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Material Design for Bootstrap Review

Depends

Should I use Material Design for Bootstrap?

Bootstrap Material Design free UI KIT - trusted by over 2 000 000 developers and designers. Vanilla JavaScript, Angular, React, Vue and jQuery versions. - mdbootstrap.com

· 1 month ago

Use the free tier if you build on Bootstrap and want Google's Material look — it is genuinely open source and component-rich. Do not pay for PRO or bet mission-critical UI on it if you need strict security headers, custom branding, or a vendor with staying power.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~20 public sources; review volume is thin (about 45 total reviews) and PRO pricing was not published in the sources reviewed.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

$0

Free

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes
PRONot disclosed in sources reviewed

Best for

  • Bootstrap apps wanting the Material Design look
  • Teams spanning React, Vue, Angular, or jQuery
  • Zero-budget prototypes and MVPs
  • Drupal sites needing a Material skin

Not for

  • Designs that must not look like Google Material
  • Apps with strict CSP or hardened security headers
  • Teams avoiding Bootstrap lock-in
  • Buyers needing enterprise-grade vendor support

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

unsafe-eval CSP violation may force weaker security headers in strict environments.

medium

PRO license is project-limited and covers current plus future employees; read terms before buying.

medium

Starting free risks a mid-project upsell once you need PRO-only components.

medium

Vendor publicly could not assure a fix timeline for the bundled CVE.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Free, open-source core kit
  • Hundreds of quality components out of the box
  • Five flavors: vanilla JS, Angular, React, Vue, jQuery
  • Claimed adoption by 2,000,000+ developers
  • Documented Drupal integration exists

Cons

  • Premium components gated behind paid PRO license
  • violates CSP via unsafe-eval, blocks hardened headers
  • Bundled 2.7.3 carried CVE-2020-7746; fix timing uncertain
  • No public security page found
  • Tiny vendor: reported $111.7K funding

Sources & method

- 12 sources - No vendor security page found; a bundled Chart.js CVE and an mdb.js CSP unsafe-eval issue are documented.

official x3review x3security x3news x3
  • Bundled Chart.js 2.7.3 affected by CVE-2020-7746, MDB's own support forum discusses CVE-2020-7746 in bundled 2.7.3; the vendor replied it could not assure when the fix would land.
  • mdb.js violates CSP with unsafe-eval, Support forum reports requires unsafe-eval, preventing A+ security-header ratings for strict sites.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 5/5

    Rating

  • $0

    Starting price

  • 12

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 5/5. Free open-source core; obvious value at $0
  • Ease of use: 4/5. Familiar Bootstrap base; guides for all five frameworks
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Hundreds of components across five framework flavors
  • Support quality: 2/5. Vendor noncommittal on CVE fix timing publicly
  • Security posture: 2/5. No security page; CSP and bundled-CVE issues documented
  • 2,000,000+ Claimed developers Per vendor tagline
  • 25 G2 reviews Small sample
  • 20 Trustpilot reviews Small sample
  • $111.7K Reported funding Crunchbase, current year

Pricing

Free

$0

  • Core open-source components
  • All five framework versions

PRO

Not disclosed

  • Premium components and templates
  • License covers current and future employees, per-project

Security

No vendor security page found; a bundled Chart.js CVE and an mdb.js CSP unsafe-eval issue are documented.

  • Bundled Chart.js 2.7.3 affected by CVE-2020-7746MDB's own support forum discusses CVE-2020-7746 in bundled 2.7.3; the vendor replied it could not assure when the fix would land.⁸
  • mdb.js violates CSP with unsafe-evalSupport forum reports requires unsafe-eval, preventing A+ security-header ratings for strict sites.⁹

What users say

Review samples are thin — roughly 25 G2 and 20 Trustpilot reviews — and generally positive but shallow.

Alternatives

Compare Material Design for Bootstrap with each alternative.

Companies that use it

Full analysis

Based on ~20 public sources; review volume is thin (about 45 total reviews) and PRO pricing was not published in the sources reviewed.

Free, component-rich Material Design kit for Bootstrap. Free tier fine; paying for PRO is where you should hesitate.

Methodology

Based on ~20 public sources; review volume is thin (about 45 total reviews) and PRO pricing was not published in the sources reviewed.

Read how a report is made.

Sources

  1. official
  2. MDB PRO UI Kit pagemdbootstrap.com
    official
  3. news
  4. review
  5. review
  6. news
  7. security
  8. security
  9. security
  10. review
  11. news
  12. official

Add this review to your site

This check for Material Design for Bootstrap says Depends.

Put the badge on your site.

Visitors see the independent review.

The link points here, and search engines follow it.

This is the badge visitors see on your site.

Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.