shouldiuse.io

VERDICT

Should I use F5, Inc. (NGINX)?

Deliver modern applications with NGINX. Explore high-performance load balancing, API gateways, and web server solutions trusted by top global enterprises. - nginx.com

Depends. Buy only if you're a large org running serious multi-cloud traffic with dedicated network and security staff. Small teams and startups should stick to free NGINX open source, Caddy, or a cloud load balancer.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~15 public sources. Caveat: most ratings are employee reviews, not product reviews, and no public pricing evidence was found.

Ratings

  • Value for moneyNo public pricing evidence found
  • Ease of useNo usability evidence found
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

Not disclosed

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed

Best for

  • Enterprises with dedicated NetOps/SecOps teams
  • Multi-cloud app delivery at scale
  • Orgs needing load balancing + WAF in one platform
  • Existing BIG-IP shops standardizing further

Not for

  • Small teams needing a simple web server or reverse proxy
  • Startups without dedicated infrastructure staff
  • Security-sensitive buyers wary after the 2025 breach
  • Teams wanting transparent, published pricing

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Nation-state attackers stole source code (Oct 2025); US agencies warn of targeted hacks on F5 users

high

Critical BIG-IP vulnerabilities face wide exploitation; expect mandatory, frequent patch cycles

medium

~650 layoffs and cut bonuses (2023) may affect staffing and support continuity

Pros and cons

Pros

  • One platform covers load balancing, WAF, API gateway, multi-cloud security
  • BIG-IP Virtual Edition available pay-as-you-go on AWS Marketplace
  • Managed WAF (Silverline) available as a cloud service via AWS
  • Nearly three decades in application delivery
  • Active community, knowledge base, and certification program (DevCentral)

Cons

  • October 2025 nation-state breach stole F5 source code
  • Critical BIG-IP flaws face wide exploitation risk
  • Employee ratings middling: 3.2–3.8/5 across review sites
  • Laid off ~650 employees and cut bonuses
  • US warns hackers are using F5 devices to target victims

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/20/2026 - 15 sources - Red flags: October 2025 nation-state breach with source code stolen, plus actively exploited BIG-IP flaws — patch discipline is essential.

official x4review x5security x2news x4
  • Nation-state breach, source code stolen (Oct 2025), F5 disclosed nation-state hackers stole source code; US agencies warned hackers could use F5 devices and stolen code to target victims.
  • Critical BIG-IP flaw exploitation risk, Cybersecurity press reports wide exploitation risk for critical BIG-IP vulnerabilities following the breach disclosure.
  • Ongoing quarterly security advisories, Regular BIG-IP security notifications indicate a steady stream of required patches.

Key stats

  • Feature depth: 4/5

    Rating

  • Not disclosed

    Starting price

  • 15

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money. No public pricing evidence found
  • Ease of use. No usability evidence found
  • Feature depth: 4/5. BIG-IP called industry standard; broad ADC platform
  • Support quality: 3/5. Knowledge base, DevCentral community, SIRT team exist
  • Security posture: 2/5. Nation-state breach; exploited BIG-IP flaws
  • 3.7/5 Glassdoor rating employee reviews
  • 175+ Employee reviews on Comparably
  • 1996 Founded Seattle, WA
  • NASDAQ: FFIV Public listing traded ~$406/share

Pricing

Not disclosed

Security

Red flags: October 2025 nation-state breach with source code stolen, plus actively exploited BIG-IP flaws — patch discipline is essential.

  • Nation-state breach, source code stolen (Oct 2025)F5 disclosed nation-state hackers stole source code; US agencies warned hackers could use F5 devices and stolen code to target victims.⁵
  • Critical BIG-IP flaw exploitation riskCybersecurity press reports wide exploitation risk for critical BIG-IP vulnerabilities following the breach disclosure.⁷
  • Ongoing quarterly security advisoriesRegular BIG-IP security notifications indicate a steady stream of required patches.

What users say

Product-user reviews are scarce publicly; employee ratings run middling (3.2–3.8/5) and one Reddit user reported recruitment ghosting.

“And F5 inc. They did the same thing to me after”
Reddit, r/recruitinghell

Alternatives

Compare F5, Inc. (NGINX) with each alternative.

  • NGINX Open Source

    Free open-source web server, reverse proxy, and load balancer.

  • Caddy

    Guess: dead-simple web server with automatic HTTPS for small teams.

  • HAProxy

    Guess: proven open-source load balancer for high-traffic sites.

Companies that use it

  • University of Derby15
Full analysis

Based on ~15 public sources. Caveat: most ratings are employee reviews, not product reviews, and no public pricing evidence was found.

Enterprise load balancing/WAF for big orgs with infra staff; small teams can use free NGINX OSS, Caddy, or a cloud LB.

Methodology

Based on ~15 public sources. Caveat: most ratings are employee reviews, not product reviews, and no public pricing evidence was found.

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. security
  5. news
  6. news
  7. news
  8. security
  9. official
  10. review
  11. F5 Layoffs — Times Nowtimesnownews.com
    news
  12. F5, Inc. — Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
    official
  13. official
  14. review
  15. official

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.