
Should I use OpenMetadata?
Introducing OpenMetadata 2.0, the open context layer for AI. - open-metadata.org
Depends. Buy it if you are a mid-size or larger data team able to self-host, patch, and operate open-source infrastructure. Skip it if you want turnkey SaaS or only have a handful of data tables.
Confidence
Medium. Based on ~30 public sources; most snippets are truncated, so detail leans on titles, official docs, and security databases.
Ratings
- Value for money
- Ease of useNo usable ease-of-use evidence in sources
- Feature depth
- Support qualityNo direct support-quality evidence found
- Security posture
Pricing
Free
Open source (self-hosted)
ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes
Collate (commercial)Not publicly listed
Best for
- →Data platform and engineering teams
- →Multi-warehouse discovery and lineage
- →Grounding AI agents in table context
- →Orgs avoiding per-seat catalog pricing
Not for
- ×Small teams with a handful of tables
- ×Anyone wanting turnkey managed SaaS
- ×Teams without DevOps capacity to self-host
- ×Buyers needing a spotless CVE record
Gotchas - check before you buy
high
Open-source is not free total cost: you run servers, upgrades, and security patches yourself.
high
2024 SpEL injection RCE (CVE-2024-28847) required emergency patching; stay current on versions.
medium
Commercial support and managed offering come via Collate; no public pricing in reviewed sources.
low
2.0 messaging pivots hard to AI; verify the AI features match your actual use case.
Pros and cons
Pros
- +Free, open-source core regularly tested against rival catalogs
- +Built-in data discovery with detailed asset views
- +2.0 repositions the platform as a context layer for AI agents
- +Recognized with a Bloomberg FOSS Fund open-source grant
- +Published case studies from FREENOW and Gorgias
Cons
- −Repeated public CVEs, including RCE and admin-access flaws
- −Self-hosting shifts patching and ops burden onto your team
- −Enterprise support requires Collate, the commercial vendor behind it
- −R/dataengineering thread alleges undisclosed employee promotion
- −Constant head-to-head comparisons with DataHub; differentiation unclear
Sources & method
Analyzed 10/05/2026 - 13 sources - Multiple CVEs from 2024–2026 (RCE, SSRF, open redirect, SSTI); vendor maintains a CVE list.
official x4review x5security x3news x1
- CVE-2024-28847: SpEL injection leading to RCE, Remote code execution via SpEL injection; patched in 2024.
- CVE-2024-28255: Unauthorized admin access, Admin access reachable with no privileges required, per scanner advisory.
- SSRF via webhook URL validation bypass (through 2.0.2), Server-side request forgery via webhook URL validation bypass, disclosed Sep 2026.
- CVE-2026-81029: Open redirect, URL redirection to untrusted site, disclosed Aug 2026.
Comments
One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.
No comments yet.