shouldiuse.io

VERDICT

Should I use Opensource.com?

Community publication about open source, originally by Red Hat - opensource.com

Depends. This is a free editorial site about open source, not a product you can buy, deploy, or integrate. Read it for free, but Red Hat wound down publishing and the community continues under the Open Source Initiative.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 40+ public sources; product is a publication, not software, so product-review evidence is inherently thin.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depthNot software; no features to assess
  • Support qualityNo support model exists
  • Security posture

Pricing

$0

Reader

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes

Best for

  • Open source newcomers
  • Devs hunting tool roundups
  • Writers contributing (now via OSI)

Not for

  • Anyone shopping for deployable software
  • Teams needing vendor support or SLAs
  • Buyers expecting new Red Hat content

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

Red Hat wound down the publication; the community relaunched under the Open Source Initiative instead

medium

Tool recommendations may be outdated; verify against current alternatives before adopting

low

It is an editorial site, not a service: no support, SLAs, or uptime commitment exists

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Free access to curated open source guides and resources
  • Large archive of open source alternatives to paid tools
  • Practitioner-written articles, not vendor marketing
  • Community relaunched under the Open Source Initiative

Cons

  • Not software: nothing to deploy, integrate, or purchase
  • Red Hat stopped publishing; site no longer actively maintained
  • Archive ages; many articles date back years
  • No security page, vendor contact, or support channel

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/24/2026 - 9 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x3review x3security x1news x2

Key stats

  • Value for money: 5/5

    Rating

  • $0

    Starting price

  • 9

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 5/5. Free to read, zero cost
  • Ease of use: 4/5. Simple article browsing with tags and resources
  • Feature depth. Not software; no features to assess
  • Support quality. No support model exists
  • Security posture: 4/5. No public vulnerability reports found
  • $0 Price Free to read, no paid tiers
  • Red Hat Publisher Opensource.com team
  • 2010 Founded Archive dates back to 2010
  • Wound down Status Community continued by Open Source Initiative

Pricing

Reader

$0

  • All articles free
  • Optional account to comment and earn badges
  • Free downloadable resources

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

Readers valued its practical guides, but Reddit threads now ask whether the site is still maintained.

“Did opensource.com move elsewhere?”
Reddit, r/redhat
“Does opensource.com no longer maintained ???”
Reddit, r/redhat
“Found some praise on opensource.com”
Reddit, r/kde
Full analysis

Based on 40+ public sources; product is a publication, not software, so product-review evidence is inherently thin.

Not a product: free Red Hat-backed open source article site, now community-run via OSI. Read it, don't buy it.

Methodology

Based on 40+ public sources; product is a publication, not software, so product-review evidence is inherently thin.

Sources

  1. About Opensource.comopensource.com
    official
  2. news
  3. review
  4. review
  5. official
  6. official
  7. security
  8. news
  9. review

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.