shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

OpenTelemetry Review

Depends

Should I use OpenTelemetry?

The open standard for telemetry - opentelemetry.io

· 1 month ago

Adopt it if you run distributed systems and have engineers to own instrumentation and pipelines. Skip it if you just need basic monitoring — a one-line logging library or an all-in-one backend is far easier.

Confidence

High. Based on 20+ public sources. OpenTelemetry is an open standard, not a paid product — costs come from backends, storage, and engineering time.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo support data in sources
  • Security posture

Pricing

$0

OpenTelemetry (open source)

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes

Best for

  • Microservices teams needing distributed tracing
  • Multi-cloud orgs avoiding vendor lock-in
  • Kubernetes/CNCF shops with dev resources
  • Orgs standardizing telemetry across backends

Not for

  • Solo devs on one monolith — a logging library is enough
  • Teams wanting dashboards out of the box; no backend or UI included
  • Anyone unwilling to run and maintain a Collector pipeline
  • Startups needing observability today without engineering time

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Instrumentation is free; ingestion and storage are not — one team pays $2,400/month sampling 1%

high

Collector defaults aren't production-safe; high availability must be configured or things break

medium

Security depends on your Collector configuration — secure setup is on you

medium

Choosing a backend/vendor is the hard part; that's where costs and lock-in creep in

Pros and cons

Pros

  • 100% free, open source, vendor-neutral standard
  • Avoids vendor lock-in across traces, metrics, and logs
  • Huge ecosystem of compatible backends and vendors
  • Widely adopted: 17,952 companies tracked using it
  • Third-party security audit published

Cons

  • Not a product: no storage, UI, or backend included
  • Backend and storage bills can explode unexpectedly
  • Setup effort high; 'worth the effort?' debates persist
  • Ecosystem complexity is the real cost, not licensing

Sources & method

- 10 sources - Actively maintained project with a published 2024 security audit, but several recent DoS CVEs in language components and the Collector.

official x2review x4security x3news x1
  • CVE-2026-40894: OpenTelemetry dotnet DoS, Excessive memory allocation causing denial of service.
  • CVE-2026-54285: opentelemetry-js Baggage DoS, Unbounded baggage input causing denial of service.
  • CVE-2026-33701: OpenTelemetry Java vulnerability, Reported vulnerability in the Java components.
  • CVE-2024-36129: Collector confighttp vulnerability, Security vulnerability in OTel Collector confighttp; project published guidance.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 4/5

    Rating

  • $0

    Starting price

  • 10

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 4/5. Software free; backend bills scale fast
  • Ease of use: 2/5. Steep setup; beginners struggle in forums
  • Feature depth: 5/5. Traces, metrics, logs across all languages
  • Support quality. No support data in sources
  • Security posture: 3/5. 2024 audit published; recurring DoS CVEs
  • $0 License cost 100% open source, CNCF-hosted
  • $2,400/mo Real-world bill example while sampling just 1% of requests
  • 17,952 Companies using it tracked by TheirStack
  • CNCF project Governance vendor-neutral, open standard

Pricing

OpenTelemetry (open source)

$0

  • APIs, SDKs, and Collector
  • Backend, storage, and UI self-hosted or bought separately

Security

Actively maintained project with a published 2024 security audit, but several recent DoS CVEs in language components and the Collector.

  • CVE-2026-40894: OpenTelemetry dotnet DoSExcessive memory allocation causing denial of service.⁷
  • CVE-2026-54285: opentelemetry-js Baggage DoSUnbounded baggage input causing denial of service.
  • CVE-2026-33701: OpenTelemetry Java vulnerabilityReported vulnerability in the Java components.
  • CVE-2024-36129: Collector confighttp vulnerabilitySecurity vulnerability in OTel Collector confighttp; project published guidance.

What users say

Developers value vendor neutrality but consistently debate whether the setup effort and ecosystem complexity are worth it.

“OpenTelemetry Costs Us $2400/Month (And We're Only Tracing 1% of Requests)”
Medium, engineering blog
“I Was Wrong: OpenTelemetry is Great, the ecosystem around it is the problem”
Medium, engineering blog
“OpenTelemetry worth the effort?”
Reddit, r/ExperiencedDevs
Full analysis

Based on 20+ public sources. OpenTelemetry is an open standard, not a paid product — costs come from backends, storage, and engineering time.

Free open-source telemetry standard — powerful, but not a product. You still pay for backends and pay heavily in setup time.

Methodology

Based on 20+ public sources. OpenTelemetry is an open standard, not a paid product — costs come from backends, storage, and engineering time.

Read how a report is made.

Sources

  1. official
  2. official
  3. review
  4. review
  5. review
  6. security
  7. security
  8. news
  9. review
  10. security

Add this review to your site

This check for OpenTelemetry says Depends.

Put the badge on your site.

Visitors see the independent review.

The link points here, and search engines follow it.

This is the badge visitors see on your site.

Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.