VERDICT
AI recruiting platform with candidate sourcing from 850M+ profiles, automated outreach, and interview scheduling. Used by 10,000+ users. From $99/mo. - pin.com
Depends. Teams sourcing candidates at volume should start on the free tier; occasional hirers are overpaying for automation they won't use. Confidence is low — evidence is mostly vendor pages plus one truncated G2 snippet, so verify limits and security directly.
Low. Based on 5 usable public sources; most search results were unrelated products (golf clubs, lapel pins, Humane AI Pin), so confidence is low.
$0
Free
high
No public security page; ask for SOC 2 or data-handling docs before uploading candidate data
medium
Paid entry is $99/mo; free-plan limits unconfirmed — check caps before building pipelines
medium
Founded 2024: shutdown and migration risk if you build workflows on it
Feature depth: 4/5
Rating
$0
Starting price
5
Sources
Analyzed
$0
From $99/mo
No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.
Independent user feedback is nearly absent; the review source found is a truncated G2 snippet suggesting consistent praise.
Compare Pin with each alternative.
The proven sourcing default; manual but reliable
Pin vs LinkedIn RecruiterEstablished AI outbound sourcing rival with longer track record
Pin vs HireEZPlenty for occasional hires; costs nothing
Based on 5 usable public sources; most search results were unrelated products (golf clubs, lapel pins, Humane AI Pin), so confidence is low.
AI recruiting tool with a free tier, but a 2024 startup with almost no independent reviews — pilot before paying.
Based on 5 usable public sources; most search results were unrelated products (golf clubs, lapel pins, Humane AI Pin), so confidence is low.
Anonymous. You can change your vote.
Loading votes…
Comments
One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.
No comments yet.