shouldiuse.io

Report

Should I Use Plane?

plane.so·Analyzed 1 hour ago·Based on 13 sources

Project management for teams and AI agents. Plan, track, and ship with Projects, Wiki, and AI. Available on cloud, self-hosted, and air-gapped.

Depends

Depends

Buy if you're an engineering-heavy or self-hosting team that wants an open-source Jira/Linear alternative.

Open-source Jira/Linear rival with self-host and air-gap options; great for engineers, but 2026 CVEs demand fast patching.

Confidence: Medium

1M+

Claimed users

vendor testimonial page

$4M seed

Funding

self-described top open-source PM tool on GitHub

makeplane/plane

Repo

tasks, sprints, docs, triage

6

CVEs surfaced

2025–2026 advisories in reviewed sources

Value for money4

Open-source core; simple per-seat cloud plans

Feature depth4

Projects, wiki, sprints, triage; air-gapped deploy option

Security posture2

Six CVEs surfaced, several high severity

Pros

  • Open-source Jira, Linear, Monday, and ClickUp alternative with sprints, docs, triage¹
  • Cloud, self-hosted, and air-gapped deployment options²
  • Raised $4M seed as top open-source PM tool on GitHub²
  • Vendor claims 1M+ users³
  • Publishes trust center and product security pages

Cons

  • Authorization bypass vulnerability disclosed (CVE-2026-46558)12
  • Unauthenticated workspace member info disclosure, CVSS 7.5 (CVE-2026-30244)10
  • Full-read SSRF via favicon fetching in Add Link (CVE-2026-27706)11
  • High-severity vulnerability, CVSS 7.7 (CVE-2026-39374)
  • CVE notes reference pre-1.3.0 releases; product still maturing

Gotchas

  • highSelf-hosting means you own patching; six CVEs surfaced, several high severity
  • mediumOpen-source vs paid feature split unclear; verify what self-host license includes
  • mediumGuess: air-gapped installs may lag cloud security fixes unless you pull updates yourself²
  • lowPer-seat pricing page exists but no prices surfaced; confirm total cost before rollout

Best for

  • Engineering teams fleeing Jira costs
  • Self-hosting and air-gapped shops
  • Docs-heavy product teams
  • Open-source buyers wanting code access

Not for

  • Non-technical teams wanting polished zero-setup SaaS
  • Orgs without discipline to patch fast; CVEs recur
  • Tiny teams that only need a basic task list

Security

Multiple CVEs disclosed in 2025–2026, including authorization bypass and unauthenticated information disclosure; vendor maintains a trust center.

  • CVE-2026-46558: Authorization bypassAuthentication/authorization weakness in Plane.12
  • CVE-2026-30244: Unauthenticated workspace member information disclosureCVSS 7.5; attacker can read workspace member data without authenticating.10
  • CVE-2026-27706: Full read SSRF via favicon fetchingServer-side request forgery through the Add Link feature.11
  • CVE-2026-39374: High-severity vulnerabilityCVSS 7.7; details via public CVE trackers.
  • CVE-2026-27949: Patched after 1.3.0Affected open-source releases prior to 1.3.0.

What users say

Genuine user feedback is scarce in reviewed sources — most search results matched the 2023 film 'Plane' — leaving only sparse positive G2 sentiment.

Alternatives

Compare Plane with each alternative.

Jira

Enterprise standard; heavier and costlier than Plane

Full analysis

Based on ~14 usable public sources; many search results matched the 2023 film 'Plane' and were discarded. No pricing numbers or verifiable customer names appeared in usable evidence.

Sources

  1. official
  2. official
  3. official
  4. official
  5. Plane Trust Centersecurity.plane.so
    official
  6. official
  7. review
  8. review
  9. security
  10. security
  11. CVE-2026-27706 SSRFendorlabs.com
    security
  12. security
  13. news

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Ask a follow-up

Ask if a use case fits. Answers stay inside this report and its sources.