shouldiuse.io

VERDICT

Should I use Pygame?

Not disclosed - pygame.org

Depends. A free, solid pick if you're learning game programming or building small 2D games in Python. Skip it if you're shipping a commercial game or can't write code yourself.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~20 public sources: G2 reviews, Reddit threads, PyPI, security databases, and comparison sites.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

$0

Open source

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes

Best for

  • Learning game programming
  • Hobbyist 2D games in Python
  • Prototypes and game jams
  • Teaching Python to beginners

Not for

  • Studios shipping commercial 3D or engine-grade games
  • Non-coders with a game idea — you write everything
  • Performance-critical or large-scale games
  • Teams needing vendor support or SLAs

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Lookalike PyPI packages like pygame-print have carried malicious code; install only official pygame

medium

CVE-2023-4863 hit pygame-ce via its libwebp dependency — keep versions updated

medium

shows no security page; patching depends on volunteers

medium

No vendor support — help means Reddit, forums, and community docs

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Free and open source, no cost or restrictions
  • Users consistently praise its ease of use and simplicity
  • Great for learning game development fundamentals
  • Decent performance for 2D games, per experienced users
  • Cross-platform Python library with an active community

Cons

  • Really a 2D library — no 3D support
  • Very basic feature set compared to real game engines
  • Slow performance reputation, especially on weak hardware
  • No editor or visual tooling — everything is code
  • Open-source project, not a product with support staff

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/21/2026 - 10 sources - One notable CVE in the pygame-ce fork via its libwebp dependency (CVE-2023-4863); the official site publishes no security page.

official x2review x4security x3news x1
  • CVE-2023-4863 via libwebp, pygame-ce 2.4.0.dev2 updated its C dependency libwebp, which carried this vulnerability; fixed in later releases.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 5/5

    Rating

  • $0

    Starting price

  • 10

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 5/5. Free, open source, no restrictions
  • Ease of use: 4/5. Users consistently praise simplicity
  • Feature depth: 2/5. 2D-only, very basic feature set
  • Support quality: 3/5. Community forums only, no vendor
  • Security posture: 3/5. CVE-2023-4863 in pygame-ce dependency; no security page
  • 4.4/5 G2 rating 34 reviews
  • $0 Price Free & open source
  • Yes Free tier Everything is free
  • 87 Companies using Per TheirStack tracker

Pricing

Open source

$0

  • Full cross-platform 2D library
  • Community support
  • No usage limits

Security

One notable CVE in the pygame-ce fork via its libwebp dependency (CVE-2023-4863); the official site publishes no security page.

  • CVE-2023-4863 via libwebppygame-ce 2.4.0.dev2 updated its C dependency libwebp, which carried this vulnerability; fixed in later releases.⁷

What users say

Hobbyists rate Pygame highly (4.4/5 on G2) for simplicity and learning value, while noting its 2D-only scope and slow-performance reputation.

“PyGame is good enough.”
Reddit, r/pygame
“Pygame is really a 2D library”
Brad Montgomery, book review
“Performance is quite slow.”
Raspberry Pi forums
Full analysis

Based on ~20 public sources: G2 reviews, Reddit threads, PyPI, security databases, and comparison sites.

Free Python library for simple 2D games — great for learning, underpowered for shipping real games. Costs $0 to try.

Methodology

Based on ~20 public sources: G2 reviews, Reddit threads, PyPI, security databases, and comparison sites.

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. PyGame vs Arcade vs PyGame Zeropythonforengineers.com
    review
  4. review
  5. official
  6. Pygame — Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
    official
  7. security
  8. security
  9. security
  10. news

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.