shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Should I use Read the Docs?

Full featured documentation deployment and hosting with versioned docs, automated builds, and search. - readthedocs.com

Depends. Buy it if you're an open-source or Python-centric team that needs free, automated, versioned technical docs. Skip it if you want WYSIWYG editing, polished marketing docs, or private docs without build-tooling overhead.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~40 public sources; verified user reviews are sparse (2 G2 reviews), so satisfaction signal is weak.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNot disclosed
  • Security posture

Pricing

$0

Community

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes
Commercial plansUp to $250/mo
EnterpriseCustom

Best for

  • Open-source project docs
  • Python/Sphinx-based teams
  • Versioned technical documentation
  • Docs on a zero budget

Not for

  • Non-technical teams wanting a WYSIWYG editor
  • Companies needing private docs on a $0 budget
  • Marketing-style docs needing heavy custom design
  • Anyone unwilling to maintain Sphinx/MkDocs config

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

Free tier is open-source only; internal company docs require commercial plans after a 30-day trial.

medium

Sphinx/MkDocs YAML config has a learning curve; expect trial-and-error during initial setup.

low

Free docs display EthicalAds advertising; removing ads requires a paid commercial plan.

low

Top commercial tier reaches $250/mo; Enterprise pricing is custom and undisclosed.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Free documentation hosting for open-source projects
  • Commercial plans use flat pricing, not per-seat
  • Full-featured docs deployment with versioned builds
  • 30-day free trial on commercial plans
  • Active open-source project with public changelogs and security handling

Cons

  • Free tier limited to open source; private docs cost money
  • Build configuration issues commonly reported by users
  • Only 2 G2 reviews; little verified user feedback
  • Some projects have migrated away; self-hosting desired

Sources & method

Analyzed 10/06/2026 - 12 sources - security policy and reporting process; two disclosed advisories in 2023, since patched.

official x3review x5security x2news x2
  • Serving arbitrary content on documentation sites (GHSA-mp38-vprc-7hf5), Disclosed Feb 14, 2023 on the repository.
  • Arbitrary write to files from builder server (GHSA-v7x4-rhpg-3p2r), Disclosed Aug 8, 2023 on the repository.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 4/5

    Rating

  • $0

    Starting price

  • 12

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 4/5. Free open-source tier; flat pricing, not per-seat
  • Ease of use: 3/5. Build configuration friction commonly reported
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Versioned builds, search, addons; rivals GitBook and Mintlify
  • Security posture: 3/5. Two disclosed 2023 advisories, patched; public policy
  • 2 G2 reviews Seller profile; rating not shown
  • $0 Starting price Community tier; commercial up to $250/mo
  • Yes Free tier Open-source docs; 30-day commercial trial
  • Bootstrapped Funding Self-funded company, no VC

Pricing

Community

$0

  • Free docs hosting for open-source projects
  • Ad-supported via EthicalAds
  • Public projects only

Commercial plans

Up to $250/mo

  • Private docs, ad-free
  • 30-day free trial
  • Higher build resources

Enterprise

Not disclosed

  • Custom pricing and terms

Security

security policy and reporting process; two disclosed advisories in 2023, since patched.

  • Serving arbitrary content on documentation sites (GHSA-mp38-vprc-7hf5)Disclosed Feb 14, 2023 on the repository.⁹
  • Arbitrary write to files from builder server (GHSA-v7x4-rhpg-3p2r)Disclosed Aug 8, 2023 on the repository.10

What users say

User feedback is sparse: open-source users value the free hosting, while some report build-configuration friction and others seek self-hosting.

“Readthedocs is free only”
Reddit, r/webdev

Companies that use it

  • Zcash (documentation)
  • PyCA Cryptography (project docs)
Full analysis

Based on ~40 public sources; verified user reviews are sparse (2 G2 reviews), so satisfaction signal is weak.

Free, battle-tested docs hosting for open-source and Python projects; paid plans and Sphinx setup make it overkill for simple docs.

Methodology

Based on ~40 public sources; verified user reviews are sparse (2 G2 reviews), so satisfaction signal is weak.

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. review
  5. official
  6. official
  7. official
  8. news
  9. security
  10. security
  11. news
  12. review

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.