shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Should I use Recras?

Smart software for leisure companies - recras.com

Depends. Buy it if you run a leisure attraction — escape room, activity park, climbing forest — and want bookings, payments, POS, and admin in one tool. Skip it if you resent revenue-share fees or need a broad review base before committing.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~15 public sources; user-review depth is thin, so fit judgments lean on category knowledge.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of useNo user-review evidence found
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo evidence in sources
  • Security posture

Pricing

Usage-based

0.5% of bookings/revenue + subscription

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly fees0.5%
HardwareNot disclosed

Best for

  • Leisure attractions and activity parks
  • Escape rooms and climbing forests
  • EU operators using Mollie payments
  • WordPress sites wanting embedded booking

Not for

  • Anyone allergic to revenue-share pricing — 0.5% forever
  • Non-leisure businesses; the tool is leisure-specific
  • Buyers who need extensive third-party integrations
  • Teams wanting a big review base before committing

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

0.5% revenue share compounds as you grow; flat-fee competitors pitch hard against it

medium

Keep the WordPress plugin updated — stored-XSS CVE affected versions ≤6.4.1

low

Embedding booking flows into your site takes real integration work, not one link

Pros and cons

Pros

  • All-in-one for leisure: bookings, payments, POS, customer admin
  • No setup fees to get started
  • WordPress plugin embeds booking directly into your site
  • Mollie payments integration built in for leisure bookings
  • Zapier support for automation with other apps

Cons

  • Charges 0.5% of revenue — fee grows with your success
  • Thin public review footprint; hard to vet real satisfaction
  • WordPress plugin had stored-XSS flaw (fixed in 6.4.2)
  • Competitors (Beyonk, ReserveBee) actively market against it — pricing friction

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/26/2026 - 13 sources - Runs a security page and HackerOne program; one 2025 stored-XSS CVE in the WordPress plugin, fixed in 6.4.2.

official x5review x4security x3news x1
  • CVE-2025-13497 — stored XSS in WordPress plugin, Authenticated contributor-level stored cross-site scripting via shortcode attribute in Recras plugin ≤6.4.1; fixed in 6.4.2.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 3/5

    Rating

  • 0.5% of bookings/revenue + subscription

    Starting price

  • 13

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 3/5. No setup fees, but 0.5% revenue cut
  • Ease of use. No user-review evidence found
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Booking, POS, payments, integrations, fixed release cycle
  • Support quality. No evidence in sources
  • Security posture: 3/5. HackerOne program, but 2025 WordPress plugin XSS CVE
  • 0.5% Booking fee of revenue, per ReserveBee comparison
  • None Setup fees per official pricing page
  • $8.8M Funding Crunchbase profile
  • 0 listed Capterra reviews very thin public review base

Pricing

Usage-based

0.5% of bookings/revenue + subscription

  • No setup fees
  • Exact plan prices not disclosed in reviewed sources

Security

Runs a security page and HackerOne program; one 2025 stored-XSS CVE in the WordPress plugin, fixed in 6.4.2.

  • CVE-2025-13497 — stored XSS in WordPress pluginAuthenticated contributor-level stored cross-site scripting via shortcode attribute in Recras plugin ≤6.4.1; fixed in 6.4.2.⁶

What users say

user feedback is sparse; one Reddit escape-room thread probes whether Recras is viable, calling it small.

“Has someone used Recras booking system? It is small but...”
Reddit, r/escaperooms

Alternatives

Compare Recras with each alternative.

  • Calendly + payment links

    Guess: cheaper DIY stack for tiny operators with simple bookings.

Companies that use it

  • Castlecomer Discovery Park
Full analysis

Based on ~15 public sources; user-review depth is thin, so fit judgments lean on category knowledge.

Niche booking suite for leisure attractions; 0.5% revenue fee and thin reviews make it a 'depends'.

Methodology

Based on ~15 public sources; user-review depth is thin, so fit judgments lean on category knowledge.

Sources

  1. official
  2. Recras Pricingrecras.com
    official
  3. review
  4. review
  5. official
  6. security
  7. security
  8. security
  9. review
  10. official
  11. official
  12. news
  13. review

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.