Should I use Ricoh?
(none) - ricoh.co.uk
Depends. Buy if you're procuring enterprise print, scanner, or managed-print fleets, or you specifically want the cult-favourite GR camera; both hold up in reviews. Skip if you want transparent pricing, a simple consumer device, or a vendor with a clean security record.
Confidence
Medium. Based on ~45 public sources; they span Ricoh's office-print business and its GR camera line, so fit depends on which Ricoh you mean.
Ratings
- Value for moneyNo public pricing to judge
- Ease of use
- Feature depth
- Support quality
- Security posture
Pricing
~$550 (original GR, 2018)
Ricoh GR compact cameras
ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierNo
Copiers / MFPsQuote-based via dealers
Managed Print ServicesEnterprise contract
Best for
- →Offices standardising MFP fleets via managed print
- →Enterprises wanting scanners and services from one vendor
- →Street photographers wanting a pocketable APS-C compact
Not for
- ×Home users wanting one cheap printer - consumer brands undercut Ricoh
- ×Small teams without IT staff - managed-print contracts are overkill
- ×Buyers needing published prices - nearly everything is quote-only
- ×Security-sensitive orgs unwilling to patch printer firmware aggressively
Gotchas - check before you buy
high
Printer driver privilege escalation (CVE-2026-50100) also hits Konica Minolta; patch fast
high
Streamline NX path traversal (CVE-2025-36506) allows unauthorised file access; restrict access
medium
Copier prices set by dealers; total cost includes service contracts - negotiate hard
medium
MFP open-redirect and SSH flaws make network isolation of printers essential
Pros and cons
Pros
- +Case studies across banks, schools, and government agencies
- +GR compacts command a cult following for image quality
- +Publishes advisories and a dedicated vulnerability information centre
- +Broad one-stop portfolio: printers, scanners, managed services, cameras
- +Positive reliability reports in sysadmin communities
Cons
- −Recent CVEs across printer drivers, Streamline NX, Web Image Monitor
- −Breach disclosure ties Ricoh services to customer data exposure
- −Quote-based pricing; no published costs for copiers or services
- −Mixed support reports; forum print-quality issues unresolved
- −Fixed-lens GR models cost ~$550 for one focal length
Sources & method
Analyzed 9/25/2026 - 12 sources - Active vulnerability stream: 2024-2026 CVEs across printer drivers, MFPs, and Streamline NX, plus a disclosed data breach.
official x2review x5security x3news x2
- CVE-2025-36506 - Streamline NX path traversal, Path traversal flaw in Ricoh Streamline NX allows unauthorised file access.
- CVE-2026-50100 - Printer driver privilege escalation, Local privilege escalation flaw in Ricoh and Konica Minolta printer drivers.
- CVE-2026-21409 - Improper authorization, Improper authorization vulnerability exists in RICOH software.
- Open redirect in Web Image Monitor, Ricoh Europe advisory covering open redirect flaw in specific MFPs and printers.
- Data breach affecting Arkansas Total Care, Breach notification tied to Ricoh; incident dated July 2 per client notice.
Comments
One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.
No comments yet.