shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Risk Ledger Review

Depends

Should I use Risk Ledger?

Network-first third-party risk management (TPRM) platform for supply chain cyber risk - riskledger.com

· 21 hours ago

Buy if you're a mid-size, public-sector, or regulated org with many suppliers and budget for a sales-led rollout. Skip it if you have a handful of vendors or need transparent, self-serve pricing.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 20+ public sources: G2, Gartner, Capterra, Omdia, case studies, and vendor pages

Ratings

  • Value for moneyNo pricing or value evidence found
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo direct support evidence in sources
  • Security posture

Pricing

Not disclosed

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed

Best for

  • Mid-to-large orgs with hundreds of suppliers
  • Public sector supply chains
  • Teams replacing spreadsheet vendor assessments
  • Regulated firms doing supplier due diligence

Not for

  • Small businesses with a handful of vendors — badly overkill
  • Buyers who want published pricing and self-serve signup
  • Teams needing a lightweight vendor contact list
  • Orgs wanting broad GRC beyond third-party risk

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

Pricing not published; expect quote-based contracts tied to supplier volume

medium

Guess: suppliers must complete assessments, so onboarding lag is likely

medium

Guess: supplier network data may be hard to export if you leave

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Network-first model: shared supplier profiles reduce repeated questionnaires
  • 4.3/5 rating across ~152 reviews
  • Named customers include Zendesk, Pentland Brands, NHS Test and Trace
  • Publishes emerging threat advisories
  • Expanding into US market (Maryland), signalling growth and investment

Cons

  • Some users report slow, inconsistent performance
  • No public pricing; sales-led demo process only
  • Only 2 Gartner reviews — thin analyst validation

Sources & method

- 8 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x2review x2security x1news x3

Key stats

  • Ease of use: 3/5

    Rating

  • Not disclosed

    Starting price

  • 8

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money. No pricing or value evidence found
  • Ease of use: 3/5. Users report slow, inconsistent performance
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Assessments, monitoring, frameworks, threat alerts
  • Support quality. No direct support evidence in sources
  • Security posture: 4/5. Publishes advisories; no public vulns found
  • 4.3/5 Review rating ~152 reviews via RFP.wiki
  • 126 G2 reviews plus Capterra/SoftwareAdvice listings
  • £24m Funding latest raise; £6.25m Series A in 2023
  • Not published Public pricing quote-based via demo

Pricing

Not disclosed

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

Reviews trend positive (4.3/5) but some users complain the platform is slow and inconsistent.

“It's slow, inconsistent,”
G2 review

Companies that use it

  • Zendesk
  • Pentland Brands
  • NHS Test and Trace
  • Synectics Solutions
Full analysis

Based on 20+ public sources: G2, Gartner, Capterra, Omdia, case studies, and vendor pages

Network-first TPRM for orgs with many suppliers; opaque pricing, overkill for small vendor lists.

Methodology

Based on 20+ public sources: G2, Gartner, Capterra, Omdia, case studies, and vendor pages

Read how a report is made.

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. news
  4. official
  5. official
  6. security
  7. news
  8. news

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.