shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

RustDesk Review

Depends

Should I use RustDesk?

WARNING: YOU MAY BE BEING SCAMMED! - rustdesk.com

· 4 days ago

Technical teams and self-hosters get a free, capable TeamViewer replacement. Enterprises with compliance needs and non-technical users face security history and setup burden.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 20 public sources; most snippets are truncated.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityToo little review evidence to score
  • Security posture

Pricing

Free

Open source (self-host)

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes
Server ProPaid plans, see pricing page

Best for

  • Self-hosters and homelab admins
  • Small IT teams cutting TeamViewer costs
  • MSPs doing client support

Not for

  • Non-technical users wanting plug-and-play
  • Enterprises needing certified vendor security
  • Teams that refuse to run servers
  • Buyers wanting strong vendor support contracts

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Server Pro charges a subscription even when you self-host the server.

medium

Antivirus tools flag RustDesk for some users; plan allowlisting steps before rollout.

medium

Pro features tie to RustDesk licenses; migration off Pro means losing the console.

low

Trustpilot shows only 9 reviews, so support quality stays hard to judge.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Free open-source client replaces paid tools like TeamViewer.
  • Self-hosting keeps traffic on your own network.
  • Reviewers call it more powerful than they expected.
  • It ships as a cross-platform open-source stack.
  • MSP-focused reviews test it as safe for client support.

Cons

  • Antivirus software flags the client for some users.
  • Server Pro needs a paid license even on your own hardware.
  • Multiple client CVEs include an auth bypass.
  • Users criticize the web client in an open letter.
  • Buyers ask whether RustDesk is a scam on Reddit.

Sources & method

- 12 sources - Sources report multiple client CVEs in 2025 and 2026, including privilege escalation and an auth bypass.

official x3review x5security x3news x1
  • CVE-2026-100388: Auth bypass, SentinelOne tracks a RustDesk authentication bypass vulnerability.
  • CVE-2025-70061: Privilege escalation, A suggested privilege escalation issue in RustDesk circulates as a public gist.
  • CVE-2026-30795: TLS validation gap, The HTTP client accepts invalid TLS certificates after the handshake.
  • CVE-2026-30785: Information disclosure, SentinelOne tracks a client information disclosure vulnerability.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 4/5

    Rating

  • Free

    Starting price

  • 12

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 4/5. Free core, but Pro fees follow self-hosting
  • Ease of use: 4/5. Reviewers say it beats their expectations
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Docs claim full features; console gaps debated
  • Support quality. Too little review evidence to score
  • Security posture: 2/5. Several client CVEs, including auth bypass
  • Yes Free tier Open-source client and community server
  • 9 Trustpilot reviews Rustdesk.com profile
  • 4+ Public CVEs cited Disclosed 2025 to 2026
  • 2020 First public release Author's Rust project write-up

Pricing

Open source (self-host)

Free

  • Full remote desktop client
  • Community server, self-managed

Server Pro

Paid plans, see pricing page

  • Admin console and address book
  • License required even on own hardware

Security

Sources report multiple client CVEs in 2025 and 2026, including privilege escalation and an auth bypass.

  • CVE-2026-100388: Auth bypassSentinelOne tracks a RustDesk authentication bypass vulnerability.⁷
  • CVE-2025-70061: Privilege escalationA suggested privilege escalation issue in RustDesk circulates as a public gist.⁸
  • CVE-2026-30795: TLS validation gapThe HTTP client accepts invalid TLS certificates after the handshake.⁹
  • CVE-2026-30785: Information disclosureSentinelOne tracks a client information disclosure vulnerability.

What users say

Self-hosters praise RustDesk as a free TeamViewer replacement, while others question its security and reputation.

“I finally started using RustDesk and I should have sooner”
XDA Developers review title
“I use RustDesk religiously”
Reddit, r/zorinos
“Is Rustdesk a scam?”
Reddit, r/rustdesk
Full analysis

Based on 20 public sources; most snippets are truncated.

Free open-source TeamViewer alternative. Fits self-hosters. Security CVEs and Pro license fees on self-hosted servers complicate it.

Methodology

Based on 20 public sources; most snippets are truncated.

Read how a report is made.

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. official
  5. official
  6. official
  7. security
  8. security
  9. security
  10. review
  11. review
  12. news

Add this review to your site

This check for RustDesk says Depends.

Put the badge on your site.

Visitors see the independent review.

The link points here, and search engines follow it.

This is the badge visitors see on your site.

Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.