shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Samba Review

Depends

Should I use Samba?

Home of Samba, the SMB file server - samba.org

· 1 month ago

Use Samba if you run Linux servers and need Windows-compatible file sharing or a free Active Directory replacement. Avoid it if you have no sysadmin; a NAS appliance or cloud drive is the same job with far less pain.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~25 public sources. No vendor pricing exists (free project) and no named corporate users appear in the evidence, so companiesUsing/companiesThatCould are omitted.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

$0

Samba

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes

Best for

  • Linux servers serving Windows and Mac clients
  • Orgs wanting a free AD domain controller
  • Homelab and NAS builders
  • Mixed-OS networks needing SMB sharing

Not for

  • Non-technical users wanting plug-and-play file sharing
  • Small teams with no dedicated sysadmin
  • Buyers who need a vendor to call when things break
  • Windows-only shops — built-in sharing already does this

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

No dedicated security page found; you must track CVEs via mailing lists yourself.

high

Unpatched older versions were remotely exploitable as root (CVE-2017-7494).

medium

Free software, but you pay in admin time: upgrades and patching are entirely on you.

medium

Migrating to Samba AD can surface replication and DNS gaps mid-project.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Completely free and open source
  • Standard Windows interoperability suite for Linux
  • Free Active Directory-compatible domain controller since v4
  • Secure, stable and fast file and print services
  • Runs on low-cost Linux machines

Cons

  • No GUI tools; text-file configuration only
  • History of serious vulnerabilities, including root RCE
  • Community support only; no vendor to escalate to
  • Beginners struggle; repeated 'anyone good with Samba?' asks
  • AD features lag Microsoft, e.g. DNS replication gaps

Sources & method

- 10 sources - Mature, openly patched project with a history of serious CVEs; the samba.org/security page returned not found at review time.

official x2review x4security x3news x1
  • CVE-2017-7494 — remote code execution as root, Unpatched Samba versions allowed remote code execution as the root user; patches were made available for older versions.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 5/5

    Rating

  • $0

    Starting price

  • 10

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 5/5. Free forever, no per-seat costs
  • Ease of use: 2/5. No GUI; text config only
  • Feature depth: 5/5. Full SMB suite plus AD domain control
  • Support quality: 2/5. Mailing lists only, no vendor helpdesk
  • Security posture: 3/5. Serious past CVEs, patched openly
  • $0 Starting price Free open-source software
  • Yes Free tier Entire product is free
  • 4.23.2 Latest release Actively maintained
  • 1992 Initial release 30+ years of development

Pricing

Samba

$0

  • Full SMB file and print server
  • Active Directory-compatible domain control
  • Community support only

Security

Mature, openly patched project with a history of serious CVEs; the samba.org/security page returned not found at review time.

  • CVE-2017-7494 — remote code execution as rootUnpatched Samba versions allowed remote code execution as the root user; patches were made available for older versions.⁵

Alternatives

Compare Samba with each alternative.

  • Synology NAS

    Plug-and-play SMB sharing with web UI, no sysadmin.

  • TrueNAS

    Polished web UI over the same Samba ecosystem.

  • Windows Server file sharing

    Native AD integration and paid vendor support.

  • Google Drive / Dropbox

    Shared folders with zero servers to run.

Full analysis

Based on ~25 public sources. No vendor pricing exists (free project) and no named corporate users appear in the evidence, so companiesUsing/companiesThatCould are omitted.

Free, powerful SMB file server for Linux — great if you can admin it; painful if you just want shared folders.

Methodology

Based on ~25 public sources. No vendor pricing exists (free project) and no named corporate users appear in the evidence, so companiesUsing/companiesThatCould are omitted.

Read how a report is made.

Sources

  1. Samba - opening windows to a wider world (official)samba.org
    official
  2. Samba (software) - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
    official
  3. Samba 4.0 released, Free Active Directory Compatible Servercommunity.spiceworks.com
    news
  4. samba file server VS window file servercommunity.spiceworks.com
    review
  5. Samba v <=3.6.3 remote code execution as the root userrstforums.com
    security
  6. Unix and Linux vulnerability in Samba (CVE-2017-7494)urban75.net
    security
  7. Is anyone experienced with Samba?facebook.com
    review
  8. Samba - have authentication ignore client's domain?forums.opensuse.org
    review
  9. Samba 4.0 - AD replacement?community.spiceworks.com
    review
  10. Samba security pagesamba.org
    security

Add this review to your site

This check for Samba says Depends.

Put the badge on your site.

Visitors see the independent review.

The link points here, and search engines follow it.

This is the badge visitors see on your site.

Depends Samba Independent review on Should I Use It

Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.