Who is Scantrust for?

Consumer brands fighting counterfeits Wineries needing EU e-labels Supply chain traceability teams CPG connected-packaging campaigns

Who is Scantrust not for?

Small shops that just need plain QR codes Solo sellers wanting self-serve signup and pricing Teams without print production budgets Buyers who need transparent public pricing

shouldiuse.io

Scantrust Review

Depends

Should I use Scantrust?

Secure QR codes for anti-counterfeiting, traceability, and EU e-labels - scantrust.com

Analyzed October 13, 2026 · 1 week ago

Buy Scantrust if you run a brand that fights counterfeits, needs serialized traceability, or must meet EU wine e-label rules. Skip it if you just need ordinary QR codes.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 24 public sources; user reviews and ratings were sparse.

Ratings

Value for money
Ease of useNo usable review data in sources
Feature depth
Support qualityHelp center exists; no ratings in sources
Security posture

Pricing

$250

Pro

ModelNot disclosed

Monthly feesNot disclosed

HardwareNot disclosed

E-labelPublished on e-label pricing page

EnterpriseCustom quote

Best for

Consumer brands fighting counterfeits
Wineries needing EU e-labels
Supply chain traceability teams
CPG connected-packaging campaigns

Not for

Small shops that just need plain QR codes
Solo sellers wanting self-serve signup and pricing
Teams without print production budgets
Buyers who need transparent public pricing

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

Secure QR codes need approved printing partners and print guidelines; plan extra lead time and cost.

medium

Official pricing exists only for e-labels; the core platform runs on custom sales quotes.

medium

A third-party site lists Pro at $250; confirm current scope and price with sales before signing.

low

Acquisitions (Trust Codes Global) and subscription changes can move features between tiers.

Pros

Covers anti-counterfeiting, traceability, and consumer engagement in one platform
SAP partner for farm-to-consumer traceability
Case studies with Knorr and DuPont show real brand deployments
Publishes a security page, DPA, and enterprise terms
EU wine e-label product with published pricing page

Cons

Built for enterprise buyers; no transparent core pricing
Secure codes require approved printing partners and extra setup
Small vendor, estimated $5.5M 2024 revenue; vendor risk exists
Comparison data on plans is sparse and partly third-party

Sources & method

Analyzed October 13, 2026 - 17 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x6review x7security x2news x2

Key stats

Value for money: 3/5
Rating
$250
Starting price
17
Sources
October 13, 2026
Analyzed

Value for money: 3/5. Custom enterprise quotes; published pricing covers e-labels only
Ease of use. No usable review data in sources
Feature depth: 4/5. Serialization, e-labels, enterprise app, SAP integration
Support quality. Help center exists; no ratings in sources
Security posture: 4/5. Publishes security page, DPA, and enterprise terms

$5.5M Est. Revenue 2024, GetLatka estimate
$250 Starting price Pro tier, third-party listing
2014 Founded Lausanne, Switzerland
$4.2M Known funding 2017 round, plus €2.35M EIC grant

Pricing

Pro

$250

Listed by MyProductPassport comparison
Confirm scope with Scantrust sales

E-label

Published on e-label pricing page

U-label e-labels for EU wine
Consumer engagement features

Enterprise

Not disclosed

Secure QR anti-counterfeiting
Serialized supply chain traceability
Enterprise app for field tasks

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

review content is thin in the sources reviewed; listings show a free consumer scanner app and a separate enterprise app.

Alternatives

Compare Scantrust with each alternative.

authe
Self-serve product passports for smaller brands
Scantrust vs authe
MyProductPassport
Product passport platform positioned for EU compliance
Scantrust vs MyProductPassport
Scanova
Guess: simpler dynamic QR codes for everyday campaigns
Scantrust vs Scanova

Capterra alternatives list
Browse listed QR and serialization competitors before committing

Companies that use it

Knorr¹²
DuPont¹³
ePac Flexible Packaging

Full analysis

Based on 24 public sources; user reviews and ratings were sparse.

Enterprise secure-QR platform for anti-counterfeiting, traceability, and EU e-labels. Overkill for basic QR needs.

Methodology

Based on 24 public sources; user reviews and ratings were sparse.

Read how a report is made.

Sources

Scantrust homepagescantrust.com
official
E-label pricingscantrust.com
official
Product security pagescantrust.com
security
SSL Labs testssllabs.com
security
MyProductPassport comparisonmyproductpassport.eu
review
authe vs Scantrust comparisonauthe.org
review
Capterra listingcapterra.com
review
GetLatka revenue estimategetlatka.com
review
Gartner Peer Insightsgartner.com
review
VentureBeat funding reportventurebeat.com
news
QA Sphere customer storyqasphere.com
review
Knorr case studyscantrust.com
official
DuPont case studyscantrust.com
official
SAP partner pagesap.com
official
Printing partner guidelinehelp.scantrust.com
official
Google Play appplay.google.com
review
Trust Codes acquisitionnatlawreview.com
news

Add this review to your site

This check for Scantrust says Depends.

Put the badge on your site.

Visitors see the independent review.

The link points here, and search engines follow it.

This is the badge visitors see on your site.

Depends Scantrust Independent review on Should I Use It

Badge code

<!-- Should I Use It badge. Keep this link. -->
<a href="https://shouldiuse.io/r/scantrust" target="_blank" style="display:inline-flex;flex-direction:column;align-items:flex-start;gap:8px;max-width:420px;box-sizing:border-box;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d5dde4;border-radius:14px;background:#ffffff;color:#111111;font-family:Segoe UI,system-ui,sans-serif;line-height:1.25;text-decoration:none;box-shadow:0 8px 20px rgba(17,17,17,0.08);">
  <span style="display:flex;align-items:center;gap:10px;min-width:0;">
    <span style="display:inline-flex;align-items:center;flex:0 0 auto;border-radius:999px;padding:4px 10px;font-size:11px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:0.06em;text-transform:uppercase;line-height:1.3;background:#fef7e0;color:#7a5510;">Depends</span>
    <span style="font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#111111;overflow-wrap:anywhere;">Scantrust</span>
  </span>
  <span style="font-size:12px;font-weight:500;color:#516271;">Independent review on Should I Use It</span>
</a>

Text link

<a href="https://shouldiuse.io/r/scantrust">Scantrust review on Should I Use It: Depends</a>

Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

No comments yet.

Categories

Scantrust Review

Confidence

Ratings

Pricing