0.0/5
G2 rating
1 review only
Report
Should I Use ScreenshotAPI?
Capture viewport or full page screenshots of any website with one API call. PNG, JPG, WebP, PDF. Blocks ads and cookie banners. No credit card required.
Depends
DependsTry it if you're a developer wanting a cheap, no-frills screenshot API and can tolerate a tiny vendor.
Cheap, capable URL-to-screenshot API — but tiny vendor, one G2 review, no security page. Fine to try, risky to rely on.
Confidence: Medium
Yes
Free tier
No credit card required
$36K ARR
2023 revenue
Getlatka estimate
#10
Market rank
of 47 active competitors (Tracxn)
Value for money
4
Self-styled low-cost; free start, no card
Ease of use
4
Single API call per official tagline
Feature depth
4
PDF, bulk, logged-in pages; scheduler quality contested
Security posture
2
No security page found in crawl
Pros
Cons
Gotchas
- high$36K ARR vendor — continuity and support depth are real risks for production use.³
- highNo public security page; verify data retention before capturing authenticated pages.⁶
- mediumReview base is one G2 review; you're beta-testing with production traffic.²
- mediumActual tier prices not visible in sources; confirm per-request costs and overage fees before committing.⁵
Best for
- Indie developers adding screenshots to apps
- One-off bulk URL captures
- Monitoring ad-heavy or logged-in pages
Not for
- Mission-critical pipelines needing uptime guarantees
- Teams needing scheduled recurring captures
- Buyers requiring security or compliance documentation
- Anyone needing vendor viability beyond a $36K shop
Pricing
Free tier: Yes
Security
No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.
What users say
Independent user feedback is nearly nonexistent — one G2 review and comparison-site blurbs, no substantive testimonials in sources.
Alternatives
Compare ScreenshotAPI with each alternative.
ScreenshotOne
Developer-focused screenshot API with free tier and active blog
ScreenshotAPI vs ScreenshotOneMicrolink
$49/month for 46,000 requests; screenshots plus metadata extraction
ScreenshotAPI vs MicrolinkPagePixels
Positions itself around real scheduling for recurring captures
ScreenshotAPI vs PagePixelsCaptureKit
Rival pitching limitless scaling and richer capture features
ScreenshotAPI vs CaptureKitFull analysis
Based on 11 public sources; independent review data is extremely thin — one G2 review, no verbatim user quotes found.
Sources
review
- Screenshot API Revenue 2023: $36K ARR — Getlatkagetlatka.comnews
news
- Website Screenshot API for Developers — ScreenshotAPI.netscreenshotapi.netofficial
- Security page — ScreenshotAPI.net (crawl found none)screenshotapi.netsecurity
review
review
- ScreenshotAPI Alternative — Microlinkmicrolink.ioreview
review
review
Rate this review
Anonymous. You can change your vote.
Loading votes…
Ask a follow-up
Ask if a use case fits. Answers stay inside this report and its sources.
Comments
One queue. No replies. Give a display name first. Limit: 7 comments per day.
No comments yet.