shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

SecureW2 Review

Depends

Should I use SecureW2?

Cloud PKI and Cloud RADIUS for certificate-based network authentication - securew2.com

· 11 hours ago

Buy if you're a mid-size or large org rolling out certificate-based 802.1X Wi-Fi or replacing on-prem NPS and CA servers. Skip it if you're a small team that can live with Wi-Fi passwords or a simpler tool like Foxpass.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 25+ public sources: G2, Capterra, Gartner, Reddit, TechCrunch, NVD, and vendor pages. Review snippets were often truncated, limiting quote extraction.

Ratings

  • Value for moneyNo public pricing figures in evidence
  • Ease of useReviews lack usable ease-of-use detail
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo review evidence on support
  • Security posture

Pricing

Contact sales

Custom quote

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed

Best for

  • Orgs moving Wi-Fi to certificate-based 802.1X
  • Teams replacing on-prem NPS/RADIUS
  • Schools and universities with many devices
  • Passwordless rollouts via cloud PKI

Not for

  • Small teams that just need a Wi-Fi password — massive overkill
  • Anyone wanting transparent, self-serve pricing
  • Home labs and solo admins
  • Orgs with no IT staff to manage certificates and RADIUS

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

Pricing is fully quote-based; expect sales negotiation, no self-serve tiers

low

Legacy SecureW2 3.0 client had a TLS flaw (CVE-2005-3087); verify you're on the current cloud product

low

Government and education buyers route through Carahsoft reseller, adding procurement layers

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Reviewers describe it as 'rock-solid' and reliable
  • Full cloud PKI plus RADIUS stack replaces on-prem CA and NPS servers
  • $80M Insight Partners backing signals financial stability
  • Sold and supported for education and government via Carahsoft

Cons

  • No published pricing; requires a sales form
  • Network admins resort to Reddit asking for ballpark costs
  • Rivals like Foxpass position themselves as simpler alternatives

Sources & method

- 10 sources - No recent CVEs found; one legacy 2005 TLS vulnerability in the old SecureW2 3.0 client.

official x4review x4security x1news x1
  • CVE-2005-3087, TLS implementation flaw in legacy SecureW2 3.0 client, rated medium severity; predates the current cloud platform.

Key stats

  • Feature depth: 4/5

    Rating

  • Not disclosed

    Starting price

  • 10

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money. No public pricing figures in evidence
  • Ease of use. Reviews lack usable ease-of-use detail
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Cloud PKI, RADIUS, guest Wi-Fi, security integrations
  • Support quality. No review evidence on support
  • Security posture: 4/5. No recent CVEs; only legacy 2005 flaw
  • 99 G2 reviews across SecureW2 products
  • $80M Funding Insight Partners, Oct 2023
  • 3.8/5 Employee rating AmbitionBox, 10 reviews

Pricing

Custom quote

Not disclosed

  • Cloud PKI
  • Cloud RADIUS
  • Device onboarding (JoinNow)

Security

No recent CVEs found; one legacy 2005 TLS vulnerability in the old SecureW2 3.0 client.

  • CVE-2005-3087TLS implementation flaw in legacy SecureW2 3.0 client, rated medium severity; predates the current cloud platform.⁷

What users say

Users on Capterra and G2 call SecureW2 rock-solid and reliable, with 99 G2 reviews across its products.

“SecureW2 is a rock-solid”
Capterra, JoinNow Cloud RADIUS review
“SecureW2- what can they see when on data only?”
Reddit, r/it

Alternatives

Compare SecureW2 with each alternative.

  • Foxpass

    Simpler, cheaper cloud RADIUS and LDAP for lean IT teams

  • Portnox

    Cloud RADIUS and NAC alternative

    SecureW2 vs Portnox
  • Keytos

    Direct PKI/RADIUS competitor with published comparisons

Full analysis

Based on 25+ public sources: G2, Capterra, Gartner, Reddit, TechCrunch, NVD, and vendor pages. Review snippets were often truncated, limiting quote extraction.

Legit, well-funded cloud PKI/RADIUS for certificate-based Wi-Fi; overkill with opaque pricing for small teams.

Methodology

Based on 25+ public sources: G2, Capterra, Gartner, Reddit, TechCrunch, NVD, and vendor pages. Review snippets were often truncated, limiting quote extraction.

Read how a report is made.

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. news
  5. official
  6. official
  7. security
  8. review
  9. official
  10. official

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.