shouldiuse.io

VERDICT

Should I use Sentry?

Application performance monitoring for developers & software teams to see errors clearer, solve issues faster & continue learning continuously. - sentry.io

Worth it. Buy if your team ships software and wants the de facto standard for error tracking — free tier, huge adoption, deep platform. Don't buy if you're non-technical or high-volume on a tight budget; event-based pricing escalates fast.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~14 usable public sources; many snippets were truncated and several unrelated 'Sentry' brands (Ivanti, Marvel, aviation) were filtered out.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of useNo clear evidence in sources
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo support evidence found
  • Security posture

Pricing

Free

Developer

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes
Pay as you growUsage-based; real bills from ~$50/mo

Best for

  • Software teams shipping to production
  • Dev-first orgs wanting fast error triage
  • Mobile and web app monitoring
  • Startups through enterprise

Not for

  • Non-technical teams — it monitors code, not people
  • Hobby projects that can live with console logs
  • Teams wanting full logs+metrics+traces observability in one tool
  • High-volume apps on tight budgets without cost controls

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Event-based pricing: one noisy service can blow past entry tiers; model error volume before committing

medium

Median buyer reportedly pays more than entry pricing suggests

medium

Self-hosted deployments carry a patch burden — SAML SSO authentication advisory exists

medium

High-volume teams migrate to self-hosted or cheaper forks; plan your exit path early

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Free Developer plan with pay-as-you-grow scaling
  • Used by 4M+ developers and 130k+ customers
  • 226 G2 reviews; roundups call its G2 ratings strong
  • Platform spans errors, APM, AI code review, mobile monitoring
  • Established vendor: $217M raised, $90M Series E

Cons

  • Real-world bills run from $50 to far more
  • Looks cheap until event volume spikes the bill
  • Pricing varies widely by usage — hard to predict
  • Constant Reddit threads hunting cheaper alternatives
  • Only 13 Trustpilot reviews — thin service-quality signal

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/20/2026 - 14 sources - Advisories target self-hosted Sentry (old authenticated RCE, SAML SSO auth flaw); vendor runs a security program.

official x4review x3security x3news x4
  • Improper authentication in self-hosted SAML SSO, GitHub advisory GHSA-rcmw-7mc7-3rj7 describes an authentication flaw in self-hosted Sentry's SAML SSO process.
  • Authenticated RCE in Sentry 8.2.0, Exploit-DB lists authenticated remote code execution against self-hosted Sentry 8.2.0 (published 2021).
  • CVE-2026-52794 on NVD, NVD lists this Sentry CVE affecting versions 24.4.0 to 26.5 per snippet; details truncated in sources reviewed.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 3/5

    Rating

  • Free

    Starting price

  • 14

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 3/5. Cheap start; volume pricing escalates
  • Ease of use. No clear evidence in sources
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Errors, APM, AI review, mobile
  • Support quality. No support evidence found
  • Security posture: 3/5. Public advisories; self-hosted risks documented
  • 226 G2 reviews Listed on G2
  • Yes Free tier Developer plan; pay as you grow
  • $217M Total funding Incl. $90M Series E
  • 4M+ Developers using Per Sentry press release

Pricing

Developer

Free

  • Error monitoring basics
  • For solo devs and evaluation

Pay as you grow

Usage-based; real bills from ~$50/mo

  • Volume-based event pricing
  • Bills scale with error volume

Security

Advisories target self-hosted Sentry (old authenticated RCE, SAML SSO auth flaw); vendor runs a security program.

  • Improper authentication in self-hosted SAML SSOGitHub advisory GHSA-rcmw-7mc7-3rj7 describes an authentication flaw in self-hosted Sentry's SAML SSO process.12
  • Authenticated RCE in Sentry 8.2.0Exploit-DB lists authenticated remote code execution against self-hosted Sentry 8.2.0 (published 2021).13
  • CVE-2026-52794 on NVDNVD lists this Sentry CVE affecting versions 24.4.0 to 26.5 per snippet; details truncated in sources reviewed.14

What users say

G2 reviewers praise effectiveness across 226 reviews, while Reddit threads focus on cost and hunting alternatives.

Full analysis

Based on ~14 usable public sources; many snippets were truncated and several unrelated 'Sentry' brands (Ivanti, Marvel, aviation) were filtered out.

Industry-standard error tracking with a real free tier; great default for dev teams, but event-based bills bite at scale.

Methodology

Based on ~14 usable public sources; many snippets were truncated and several unrelated 'Sentry' brands (Ivanti, Marvel, aviation) were filtered out.

Sources

  1. Sentry Pricing: Free Developer Plan, Pay as You Growsentry.io
    official
  2. Sentry Security, Privacy, and Compliance Practicessentry.io
    official
  3. Sentry Acquires Emerge Tools (4M+ developers)sentry.io
    official
  4. Sentry Customer Stories (130k+ customers)sentry.io
    official
  5. Sentry Products — 226 G2 Reviewsg2.com
    review
  6. Trustpilot reviews of sentry.iotrustpilot.com
    review
  7. Alternatives to Sentry.io — r/devopsreddit.com
    review
  8. Sentry Pricing 2026: Real Bills From $50last9.io
    news
  9. Saving Costs on Sentry at Scale — Bugsinkbugsink.com
    news
  10. Sentry Pricing & Review — CubeAPMcubeapm.com
    news
  11. How Much Did Sentry Raise? — Clayclay.com
    news
  12. GHSA-rcmw-7mc7-3rj7: SAML SSO improper authenticationgithub.com
    security
  13. Sentry 8.2.0 Authenticated RCE — Exploit-DBexploit-db.com
    security
  14. CVE-2026-52794 — NVDnvd.nist.gov
    security

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.