shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Should I use Skyscanner?

Compare and book cheap flights from anywhere, to everywhere - skyscanner.com

Worth it. Use it if you're a traveler hunting cheap flights — it's free and scans most airlines and providers. Skip it if you want one vendor for booking, support, or corporate travel controls; it hands you to third parties.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~14 public sources; many are Skyscanner marketing mirrors, so independent review evidence is thin.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo support evidence in sources
  • Security posture

Pricing

$0

Free

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes

Best for

  • Budget leisure travelers
  • Flexible-date and 'everywhere' searches
  • Comparing OTAs before booking direct
  • Deal hunters tracking fares

Not for

  • Corporate travel needing invoicing, policy, duty-of-care
  • Anyone wanting single-vendor booking and support
  • Group or agent-managed travel bookings
  • People annoyed by redirects to third-party sites

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

Fares may change due to availability by the time you book

medium

Redirects to airlines/OTAs; their support handles issues, not Skyscanner

low

Guess: referral model means listed providers may be commercially prioritized

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Free to search; scans top airlines and travel providers
  • Search with AI, plus stays and hotels
  • Named in Frommers' best airfare search sites for 2026
  • Established brand, operating since 2002

Cons

  • Primary service is search; booking completes on third-party sites
  • Final price set by each travel provider, may differ
  • Some travelers simply prefer Google Flights for booking

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/30/2026 - 8 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x4review x2security x1news x1

Key stats

  • Value for money: 5/5

    Rating

  • $0

    Starting price

  • 8

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 5/5. Free searches comparing many providers
  • Ease of use: 4/5. Search-first interface, no signup required
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Flights, stays, AI search on homepage
  • Support quality. No support evidence in sources
  • Security posture: 4/5. Publishes security page; no public findings
  • 2002 Founded Skyscanner Ltd copyright dates to 2002
  • $0 Price to search Free metasearch; you pay the airline or OTA
  • Top 10 Frommers 2026 list Best and cheapest airfare search sites

Pricing

Free

$0

  • Unlimited flight searches
  • Stays and hotel comparison
  • AI-powered search

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

Independent user evidence is sparse; a review aggregator describes it as search-focused and a Reddit thread favors Google Flights.

“Google flights was the best thing I ever used to book flights.”
Reddit, r/travel
“The primary service is the flight search feature”
TenereTeam review page
Full analysis

Based on ~14 public sources; many are Skyscanner marketing mirrors, so independent review evidence is thin.

Free flight metasearch: great for comparing fares, but booking and support happen elsewhere.

Methodology

Based on ~14 public sources; many are Skyscanner marketing mirrors, so independent review evidence is thin.

Sources

  1. Skyscanner homepageskyscanner.com
    official
  2. security
  3. TenereTeam Skyscanner reviewsskyscanner.tenereteam.com
    review
  4. news
  5. review
  6. Google Flightsgoogle.com
    official
  7. Momondomomondo.com
    official
  8. official

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.