1994
Founded
Began as Urban Legends Reference Pages
Report
Should I Use Snopes.com?
The definitive Internet reference source for researching urban legends, folklore, myths, rumors, and misinformation.
Worth it
Worth itIndividuals, journalists, and researchers should use it — it is free to read, long-established, and well-regarded for checking viral claims.
Free, well-regarded fact-checker since 1994 — great for checking viral claims; not an enterprise monitoring or API tool.
Confidence: Medium
Oldest & largest
Standing
Fact-checking site online
Left-Center
Bias rating
Per Media Bias/Fact Check
Platform partner
Used in content review
Value for money
5
Guess: free to read, no paywall
Ease of use
4
Transparent ratings system speeds claim checks
Feature depth
3
Deep claim archive; no API or tooling shown
Security posture
2
No public security page found
Pros
- Oldest and largest fact-checking site online, running since 1994²
- Transparent ratings system helps readers quickly judge claim credibility³
- Used by Facebook as a partner in content review⁴
- Large claim archive widely referenced by journalists and researchers⁵
- Described as a well-regarded reference for sorting out rumors⁷
Cons
Gotchas
Best for
- Individuals checking viral claims
- Journalists verifying rumors
- Researchers studying misinformation
- Teachers debunking legends in class
Not for
- Teams needing automated, real-time misinformation monitoring — no API
- Buyers requiring a zero-bias source — rated Left-Center, not neutral
- Anyone treating it as peer-reviewed research — it's journalism, not academia
Companies that use it
- Facebook⁴
Security
No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.
What users say
Third-party reviewers describe Snopes as a long-standing, well-regarded fact-checking authority with a transparent ratings system.
Alternatives
Compare Snopes.com with each alternative.
PolitiFact
Pulitzer-winning fact-checks of US politics and viral claims
Snopes.com vs PolitiFactFactCheck.org
Nonpartisan Annenberg project focused on US political claims
Snopes.com vs FactCheck.orgFull Fact
UK-based fact-checking charity with heavier tooling focus
Snopes.com vs Full FactMedia Bias/Fact Check
Rates news-source bias; pairs well with claim checkers
Full analysis
Based on 14 public sources; no pricing, security, or verbatim user-review data found.
Sources
- Snopes.com homepagesnopes.comofficial
- Snopes About Ussnopes.comofficial
- Snopes Fact Check Ratingssnopes.comofficial
- Is Snopes a Good Fact-Check Website?factually.coreview
review
- Snopes bias review — Media Bias/Fact Checkmediabiasfactcheck.comreview
- Snopes — Wikipediaen.wikipedia.orgreview
news
- Snopes security pagesnopes.comsecurity
- Snopes | CredCatalog — Credibility Coalitioncredibilitycoalition.orgreview
Rate this review
Anonymous. You can change your vote.
Loading votes…
Ask a follow-up
Ask if a use case fits. Answers stay inside this report and its sources.