shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Should I use Social Solutions?

Skip to Main Content - socialsolutions.com

Depends. Evidence is thin (low confidence), but this is enterprise-grade case and grant management (Apricot/ETO, now under Bonterra) for mid-size nonprofits and government agencies with funder-mandated reporting. Small nonprofits or buyers wanting simple tracking and transparent pricing should not buy it.

Confidence

Low. Based on ~11 public sources. Confidence is low: no pricing or aggregate ratings found, and many same-name reviews belong to an unrelated consulting firm.

Ratings

  • Value for moneyNo pricing evidence found
  • Ease of useNo usable usability reviews found
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

Not disclosed

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed

Best for

  • Mid-size nonprofits with funder-mandated reporting
  • Government agencies tracking grants and outcomes
  • Multi-program human-services organizations

Not for

  • Tiny nonprofits — a spreadsheet or Airtable beats this
  • Teams wanting a simple sales CRM — this is case management
  • Orgs without an admin to own configuration and reporting
  • Buyers needing transparent, self-serve pricing

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Confirm you're buying current Apricot, not legacy ETO or Penelope; migrations and support differ.

medium

Sales-led pricing: expect quotes, negotiation, and varied nonprofit discounts — budget procurement time.

medium

Old Social Solutions contracts, docs, and SLAs now live under Bonterra — check which entity you sign with.

low

Gartner classifies it in state/local grant management — verify fit if you're a small nonprofit.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • TrustRadius Most Loved Award 2022 signals strong user satisfaction
  • Products (Apricot, ETO) built for nonprofit compliance and outcome reporting
  • Formal support SLA published with accountable response commitments
  • Compared seriously against SmartSimple in Gartner's grant-management category

Cons

  • No public pricing — sales contact required
  • ETO and Penelope labeled legacy in vendor comparisons
  • Rebrand to Bonterra creates naming confusion across docs and contracts

Sources & method

Analyzed 10/05/2026 - 11 sources - Vendor publishes a product security page; no known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x4review x3security x1news x3

Key stats

  • Feature depth: 4/5

    Rating

  • Not disclosed

    Starting price

  • 11

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money. No pricing evidence found
  • Ease of use. No usable usability reviews found
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Compliance and outcome reporting is its core strength
  • Support quality: 3/5. Formal SLA published; actual quality unverified
  • Security posture: 3/5. Public security page; no public issues found
  • Most Loved Award TrustRadius recognition 2022
  • Now Bonterra Brand status Rebranded from Social Solutions
  • Not published Pricing No public rates found in sources reviewed

Pricing

Not disclosed

Security

Vendor publishes a product security page; no known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

Independent reviews are sparse and most same-named results online belong to an unrelated consulting firm; Gartner users weigh it against SmartSimple for grant management.

Alternatives

Compare Social Solutions with each alternative.

  • SmartSimple

    Head-to-head grant-management rival compared on Gartner Peer Insights.

  • Charity Tracker

    Lighter community-care tracking aimed at smaller nonprofits.

    Social Solutions vs Charity Tracker
  • Airtable or a spreadsheet

    Tiny teams should track cases here before buying heavy software.

Companies that use it

  • Anne Arundel County (MD)10
  • Sonoma County (Upstream Investments)11
Full analysis

Based on ~11 public sources. Confidence is low: no pricing or aggregate ratings found, and many same-name reviews belong to an unrelated consulting firm.

Now Bonterra. Heavy case/grant management for nonprofits & agencies; overkill for small teams — hidden pricing, legacy products in play.

Methodology

Based on ~11 public sources. Confidence is low: no pricing or aggregate ratings found, and many same-name reviews belong to an unrelated consulting firm.

Sources

  1. news
  2. review
  3. review
  4. official
  5. Product security pagesocialsolutions.com
    security
  6. review
  7. news
  8. official
  9. news
  10. Anne Arundel County Systems Transformation (ETO software)earlychildhood.marylandpublicschools.org
    official
  11. official

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.