shouldiuse.io

VERDICT

Should I use Source of Sources?

Connecting reporters with high-quality sources - sourceofsources.com

Worth it. Buy if you are a founder, expert, or small PR team that wants free journalist quote requests after HARO's demise. Skip it if you need a media database, pitching automation, or guaranteed coverage.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 20+ public sources; many snippets truncated, so some claims rest on roundup coverage.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo evidence found
  • Security postureNo vulnerability or audit data in reviewed sources

Pricing

$0

Free

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes

Best for

  • Founders and experts seeking press quotes
  • Freelance PR and small agencies
  • Journalists needing fast sources
  • Bootstrapped SEO link-building

Not for

  • Teams needing a media database, pitching, or outreach automation
  • Anyone expecting guaranteed placements or backlinks
  • Enterprise PR departments wanting reporting and workflow management

Gotchas - check before you buy

low

Marketed as free, but guides still field 'is it free?' questions; verify current terms

low

HARO name now belongs to; SoS is a separate successor — don't confuse them

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Free to use, per the site and multiple guides
  • Created by HARO founder Peter Shankman after HARO shut down
  • Ranked among best HARO alternatives by Search Engine Land
  • Positioned as a like-for-like free HARO replacement

Cons

  • 'Is it legit?' chatter circulates on social media
  • Relatively new product; thin independent track record

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/27/2026 - 13 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x1review x7security x1news x4

Key stats

  • Value for money: 5/5

    Rating

  • $0

    Starting price

  • 13

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 5/5. Free across site and multiple independent guides
  • Ease of use: 4/5. Site describes itself as 'very simple'
  • Feature depth: 2/5. Deliberately minimal query-matching, no outreach tools
  • Support quality. No evidence found
  • Security posture. No vulnerability or audit data in reviewed sources
  • $0 Starting price Free per site and third-party guides
  • Yes Free tier Marketed as a no-cost HARO alternative
  • 2024 Founded Launched by Peter Shankman after HARO shut down
  • 3+ Expert roundups Search Engine Land, Medialyst HARO/Qwoted guides

Pricing

Free

$0

  • Journalist query requests delivered to you
  • Respond as a source
  • No cost per site and guides

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

Guides and users treat it as the credible free successor to HARO from its original founder, with some social media chatter questioning its legitimacy.

“You don't even have to be well-known to get into top publications”
Facebook post, Edward Sturm
Full analysis

Based on 20+ public sources; many snippets truncated, so some claims rest on roundup coverage.

Free HARO successor from HARO's original founder. Ideal for cheap press quotes; not a full PR or outreach suite.

Methodology

Based on 20+ public sources; many snippets truncated, so some claims rest on roundup coverage.

Sources

  1. Source of Sources — homesourceofsources.com
    official
  2. review
  3. review
  4. review
  5. news
  6. review
  7. review
  8. review
  9. review
  10. news
  11. news
  12. security
  13. news

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.