shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Source of Sources Review

Worth it

Should I use Source of Sources?

Connecting reporters with high-quality sources - sourceofsources.com

· 1 month ago

Solo founders, experts, and small PR teams should sign up — it's free and built by HARO's original creator. Skip it if you need a media database, pitch tracking, or any guarantee of coverage.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 20 public sources; mostly roundup mentions and official pages, few independent user reviews

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo support evidence in reviewed sources
  • Security posture

Pricing

$0

Free

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes

Best for

  • Founders chasing press quotes
  • Solo PR consultants
  • Journalists needing fast sources
  • SEO teams wanting free backlinks

Not for

  • Teams needing media databases and pitch analytics
  • Anyone expecting guaranteed coverage
  • Enterprises wanting vendor SLAs and support contracts
  • Marketers wanting automated outreach sequences

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

Guess: expect low journalist response rates without fast, specific pitches

low

Guess: free tools sometimes add paid tiers later; recheck pricing before building workflows on it

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Completely free for sources and reporters
  • Built by Peter Shankman, HARO's original founder (2008)
  • Ranked among the five best HARO alternatives by Search Engine Land
  • Called a like-for-like free HARO replacement in 2026 roundups
  • Very simple: enter your email, receive journalist queries

Cons

  • Guess: no placement guarantees — coverage needs fast, tailored pitches
  • Email-digest format only; no pitch tracking, database, or analytics
  • Few independent user reviews; coverage is mostly roundup mentions

Sources & method

- 10 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x2review x3security x3news x2

Key stats

  • Value for money: 5/5

    Rating

  • $0

    Starting price

  • 10

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 5/5. Completely free; no paid tier found
  • Ease of use: 4/5. Site describes itself as 'very simple' email signup
  • Feature depth: 2/5. Guess: email queries only, no outreach suite
  • Support quality. No support evidence in reviewed sources
  • Security posture: 3/5. Published security and privacy pages; no incidents found
  • $0 Starting price Free for sources and reporters
  • Yes Free tier Site promises 'No Cost, Yes Really'
  • Peter Shankman Founder Created HARO in 2008
  • Top-5 pick Recognition Search Engine Land HARO alternatives, 2026

Pricing

Free

$0

  • Journalist query emails
  • Respond to reporters as a source
  • No paid tier advertised

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

Mentions come mostly from SEO and PR roundups recommending it as a free HARO stand-in; genuine user reviews are scarce.

“Fwiw Peter Shankman has a (relatively) new HARO alternative at”
Threads, @rudylopesauthor
Full analysis

Based on 20 public sources; mostly roundup mentions and official pages, few independent user reviews

Free, bare-bones HARO successor from HARO's founder — worth signing up, but it won't replace a PR outreach suite.

Methodology

Based on 20 public sources; mostly roundup mentions and official pages, few independent user reviews

Read how a report is made.

Sources

  1. Source of Sources homepagesourceofsources.com
    official
  2. Source of Sources reporter pagesourceofsources.com
    official
  3. Five best HARO alternatives (Expert review)searchengineland.com
    review
  4. 7 Best HARO Alternatives in 2026medialyst.ai
    review
  5. HARO Alternatives Compared | DNA PRdigitalnetworkingagency.com
    review
  6. How to Earn Coverage With Source of Sources (BuzzStream podcast)buzzstream.com
    news
  7. HARO's Acquisition by Featured.comhyperlinks.co
    news
  8. Product security pagesourceofsources.com
    security
  9. Privacy Policysourceofsources.com
    security
  10. Universal Terms of Servicesourceofsources.com
    security

Add this review to your site

Source of Sources earned a Worth it check.

Put the badge on your site, pricing page, or docs.

Visitors see an independent review.

The link points here, and search engines follow it.

This is the badge visitors see on your site.

Worth it Source of Sources Independent review on Should I Use It

Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.