1.7/5
Trustpilot score
'Bad' public rating
Report
Public programming Q&A site plus paid Stack Internal for Teams
Depends
DependsIndividual developers should keep using the free site as an archive, but expect fewer fresh answers as AI tools pull questions away.
Free Q&A archive still worth searching, but the community is shrinking 77% and paying for Teams is hard to justify.
1.7/5
Trustpilot score
'Bad' public rating
-77%
New questions
decline reported since AI tools arrived
$1.8B
Acquisition
Bought by Prosus, 2021
719
Companies on record
tracked users of Stack Overflow
Public site is free; paid Teams tier draws pricing complaints
Beginners report hostile, gatekept answers
Deep archive, review queues, annual developer surveys
Community-driven; moderation widely called unwelcoming
2019 production breach; now claims TDE encryption
Free
Contact us
One known production breach in 2019; the company now markets SQL TDE encryption and privacy controls.
Long-time developers praise the answer archive but describe a shrinking, beginner-hostile community.
“StackOverflow is by far the best quality-contro...”
“Is StackOverflow a toxic place to ask questions, or am I just ...”
“StackOverflow has lost 77% of new questions compare...”
Compare Stack Overflow with each alternative.
Faster answers, trained on Stack Overflow itself; where most devs went
Stack Overflow vs ChatGPTFriendlier for beginner and opinion questions
Self-hosted Q&A alternative to the paid Teams product
Stack Overflow vs TalkyardCheaper internal knowledge base than Stack Internal
Stack Overflow vs Guru or a shared wikiBased on 30+ public sources: Trustpilot, Reddit threads, Meta Stack Exchange, security reports, pricing pages, and news coverage.
Anonymous. You can change your vote.
Loading votes…
Ask if a use case fits. Answers stay inside this report and its sources.
Comments
One queue. No replies. Give a display name first. Limit: 7 comments per day.
No comments yet.