VERDICT
Depends
Should I use stats.fm?
Plus - stats.fm
· 2 days ago
Buy Plus if you're a music nerd who wants all-time listening stats and leaderboards beyond Spotify Wrapped. Skip it if you only check stats occasionally — Spotify's native listening stats and the free tier cover casual use.
Medium. Based on ~25 public sources (Reddit, app stores, Trustpilot, official pages)
$0
Free
medium
Plus is a recurring annual subscription now; early adopters paid $2.
medium
Lifetime history needs importing your full Spotify data export; streams before signup don't sync automatically.
medium
Community sentiment on whether Plus is worth paying is split; check r/statsfm first.
Value for money: 3/5
Rating
$0
Starting price
15
Sources
Analyzed
$0
Annual subscription (exact price not shown in sources)
$15 excl. VAT
No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.
Users love the all-time stats for daily use, but a vocal group says it's less worth paying for since Spotify launched native listening stats.
“Overall 10/10. I use this app daily.”
“STATSFM ISN'T WORTH IT ANYMORE”
“How much is Plus now? I paid $2 when I first started using”
Compare stats.fm with each alternative.
Veteran scrobbling service; tracks listening long-term across platforms.
Spotify stats tool compared alongside stats.fm.
Spotify and SoundCloud stats alternative to stats.fm.
Free music stats app covering stats.fm, last.fm and more.
Based on ~25 public sources (Reddit, app stores, Trustpilot, official pages)
Great year-round all-time Spotify stats, but Spotify's own listening stats now cover much of it and Plus prices rose.
Based on ~25 public sources (Reddit, app stores, Trustpilot, official pages)
Anonymous. You can change your vote.
Loading votes…
Comments
One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.
No comments yet.