VERDICT
An ongoing analysis of Steam's concurrent players. - steamcharts.com
Worth it. Use it — it's free, instant, and fine for casual checks on how a Steam game's player base is trending. Do not use it as authoritative market data: counts are Steam-only, widely disputed, and there is no official API.
Medium. Based on 30+ public sources; mostly community discussion and press citations, no vendor ratings or paid tiers.
$0
Free
high
Concurrent players ≠ total players or sales; users constantly fight over misread numbers
medium
No API: scrapers break when the site changes; multiple Apify scraper issues logged
low
No published security page; the /security URL returns 404
Value for money: 5/5
Rating
$0
Starting price
10
Sources
Analyzed
$0
No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.
Users lean on Steamcharts for popularity drama and trend checks, but many openly dispute its accuracy and switch to SteamDB.
“Steam charts are so exciting today!”
“I KNEW Steamcharts was full of shit!”
“Use SteamDB instead of Steam Charts for player counts”
Compare Steamcharts with each alternative.
More trusted real-time counts; community favorite
Estimates owners and sales ranges, not just concurrents
Valve's own top-sellers and player-count pages
Third-party per-game stats with similar breakdowns
Based on 30+ public sources; mostly community discussion and press citations, no vendor ratings or paid tiers.
Free Steam concurrent-player tracker. Great for casual trend checks; shaky accuracy, Steam-only, no API.
Based on 30+ public sources; mostly community discussion and press citations, no vendor ratings or paid tiers.
Anonymous. You can change your vote.
Loading votes…
Comments
One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.
No comments yet.