shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Should I use StockIQ Technologies?

Smarter supply chain planning. AI-powered. Expert-backed. Rapid ROI. Move on from spreadsheets. - stockiqtech.com

Depends. Buy if you're a manufacturer or distributor with real demand-planning pain and a Dynamics or Acumatica ERP. Skip if you run a small inventory on spreadsheets — this is custom-priced, mid-market software.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 30+ public sources; review snippets lacked verbatim user quotes and rating numbers.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of useNo usability evidence in sources
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

Not published

Custom quote

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed

Best for

  • Manufacturers and distributors
  • Dynamics 365/GP/AX or Acumatica shops
  • Mid-market teams outgrowing spreadsheets
  • Inventory-heavy planning with capacity needs

Not for

  • Small teams with a simple reorder list — spreadsheets win
  • Buyers wanting transparent, self-serve pricing
  • Retail or service businesses without ERP-driven planning
  • Teams without clean ERP data or a planning owner

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

No published prices; expect a quote-based sales cycle scaling with your planning complexity

medium

No public security page; request security documentation during evaluation

medium

Capacity planning requires multiple data files; clean your ERP data before implementation

medium

Small vendor (~$2.5M revenue); verify support SLAs and reference customers

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Integrates with Dynamics 365, AX, GP, and Acumatica
  • Offers cloud-based or on-premise deployment
  • Vendor publicly responds to customer reviews on Capterra
  • Earned new Winter 2026 G2 awards
  • PE-backed by Serent Capital in April 2025 for growth

Cons

  • No published pricing; sales must quote everything
  • No public security page on vendor site
  • Sub-scale vendor: ~$2.5M estimated annual revenue
  • Recent PE backing (2025) may shift product priorities

Sources & method

Analyzed 10/02/2026 - 11 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x4review x4news x3

Key stats

  • Value for money: 2/5

    Rating

  • Not published

    Starting price

  • 11

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 2/5. No public pricing; custom quotes only
  • Ease of use. No usability evidence in sources
  • Feature depth: 4/5. AI demand planning, capacity planning, cloud/on-prem, ERP integrations
  • Support quality: 3/5. Vendor replies to reviews; support portal and tutorials exist
  • Security posture: 2/5. No public security page found
  • 2015 Founded Per RocketReach
  • $2.5M/yr Est. revenue GetLatka estimate
  • None Public pricing Custom quotes only
  • 3 Named case studies Auveco, Presperse, Meridian

Pricing

Custom quote

Not published

  • Quote-based, varies by planning environment
  • Subscription model per GetApp
  • Cloud or on-premise options

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

StockIQ appears on G2, Capterra, and TrustRadius and the vendor replies to reviews, but the sources expose no verbatim user quotes or ratings.

Companies that use it

  • Auveco
  • Presperse
  • Meridian
Full analysis

Based on 30+ public sources; review snippets lacked verbatim user quotes and rating numbers.

Legit mid-market AI demand planning for Dynamics/Acumatica manufacturers; opaque pricing, overkill for small spreadsheet teams.

Methodology

Based on 30+ public sources; review snippets lacked verbatim user quotes and rating numbers.

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. review
  5. official
  6. Pricingstockiqtech.com
    official
  7. official
  8. official
  9. news
  10. news
  11. news

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.