shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Should I use Talview?

AI Proctoring & AI Interviewing for Trusted Assessments - talview.com

Depends. Talview fits enterprises and institutions running high-volume, high-stakes assessments with budget for a sales-led contract. Small teams and buyers wanting transparent, self-serve pricing should look elsewhere.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 18+ public sources: G2, Capterra, TrustRadius, Reddit, vendor case studies, security pages, and funding news.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

Not disclosed

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed

Best for

  • Enterprise high-volume hiring
  • Universities and certification bodies
  • Campus recruitment drives
  • Teams needing ATS integration

Not for

  • Small teams — alternatives start at $49/month
  • Anyone wanting self-serve, transparent pricing
  • Low-volume hiring; serious overkill
  • Buyers wary of candidate AI-proctoring backlash

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Candidates refuse AI proctoring, which can slow or stall your hiring funnel

medium

Pricing hidden behind sales calls; expect custom quotes and negotiated contracts

medium

Public candidate backlash and one university's abrupt exit signal reputational risk

medium

Competitor comparisons flag Talview's pricing clarity as a weakness

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Rated 4.4/5 across 118 G2 reviews
  • Seven-layer security framework with secure browser option
  • PwC saved 1,600+ hours screening with Talview
  • ZS Associates cut time-to-hire 70%
  • Integrates with SAP SuccessFactors and SmartRecruiters ATS

Cons

  • No public pricing; quotes only after sales contact
  • Some candidates immediately cancel AI-proctored interviews
  • One university urgently dropped Talview, citing security worries
  • Built enterprise-first; heavy for small recruiting needs

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/26/2026 - 18 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x4review x9security x4news x1

Key stats

  • Value for money: 3/5

    Rating

  • Not disclosed

    Starting price

  • 18

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 3/5. Opaque pricing; enterprise-only quotes
  • Ease of use: 4/5. Called simple and user-friendly by reviewers
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Full hiring lifecycle plus proctoring, deep integrations
  • Support quality: 4/5. Capterra reviewers cite excellent customer service
  • Security posture: 4/5. Seven-layer framework; no public CVEs found
  • 4.4/5 G2 rating 118 reviews
  • None Public pricing Custom enterprise quotes only
  • $22.5M Funding Series B, July 2025

Pricing

Not disclosed

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

Companies that use it

  • PwC14
  • HCL America15
  • ZS Associates16
  • City & Guilds13
  • Best Buy
Full analysis

Based on 18+ public sources: G2, Capterra, TrustRadius, Reddit, vendor case studies, security pages, and funding news.

Enterprise AI hiring + exam proctoring; powerful at scale, opaque pricing, candidates sometimes refuse it.

Methodology

Based on 18+ public sources: G2, Capterra, TrustRadius, Reddit, vendor case studies, security pages, and funding news.

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. review
  5. official
  6. review
  7. review
  8. review
  9. review
  10. security
  11. security
  12. security
  13. security
  14. official
  15. official
  16. official
  17. news
  18. review

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.