Free
Starting price
Community plan
Report
Should I Use Transloadit?
Upload, process, store, and deliver files through one API. Build image processing, video encoding and document workflows with Transloadit.
Depends
DependsBuy if your dev team needs programmatic uploads, encoding, and delivery at scale.
Powerful file-processing API for developer teams; overkill for simple uploads and non-technical buyers.
Confidence: Medium
5
Paid tiers
Plus custom Enterprise
$1.3M
Est. ARR 2024
GetLatka estimate
Uppy + tus
Open-source tools
Maintained by Transloadit
Value for money
4
Free Community tier; usage-based paid tiers.
Ease of use
4
G2 reviewers report easy integration.
Feature depth
5
Called most advanced; multi-step media workflows.
Security posture
3
Multiple Uppy CVEs; otherwise active disclosure handling.
Pros
Cons
Gotchas
- highCritical 2025 auth-bypass CVE in Uppy — patch immediately if self-hosting⁸
- mediumUsage-based pricing; costs scale with file volume — model your usage before committing
- mediumGuess: migrating encoded workflows away means rebuilding your automation logic
- mediumVendor is tiny (~$1.3M ARR); support depth and longevity carry risk⁶
Best for
- Developer teams building file pipelines
- Video/image encoding at scale
- Apps needing resumable, chunked uploads
- Media-heavy SaaS products
Not for
- Non-technical teams wanting simple file storage
- Small apps that only need basic uploads
- Buyers wanting a large vendor with deep support staff
- One-off image resizing — a script is cheaper
Companies that use it
- WeTransfer11
- Coursera
- Vū Technologies
- OptiSigns
Pricing
Community
Free
- Free to start
Paid tiers
Usage-based, 4 tiers
- Details on vendor pricing page
Enterprise
Not disclosed
- Custom enterprise tier
Security
Multiple CVEs in its open-source Uppy uploader, including a critical 2025 auth bypass; vendor runs a security page and has patched issues quickly.
- CVE-2025-70023 — Uppy authentication bypassCritical auth bypass in Transloadit's Uppy uploader.⁸
- CVE-2022-0086 — Uppy vulnerabilityOne of several listed CVEs affecting Uppy.
- ImageTragick (CVE-2016-3714) exposureTransloadit was affected by the 2016 ImageMagick flaw and responded publicly.
What users say
Reviewers describe easy integration and category-leading depth, and Reddit developers point to Transloadit for chunked uploads.
“Transloadit makes it easy for us to…”
“Transloadit the company behind tus and uppy…”
Alternatives
Compare Transloadit with each alternative.
Uploadcare
Similar upload-and-process API; often simpler to adopt.
Transloadit vs UploadcareEncoding.com
Video-encoding specialist if that is your only need.
Transloadit vs Encoding.comCloudinary
Stronger fit for image-heavy pipelines and asset management.
Transloadit vs CloudinarySelf-hosted open source
Uppy plus ffmpeg/ImageMagick on your own servers.
Full analysis
Based on ~20 public sources: review sites, CVE databases, Reddit threads, vendor pages, and case studies. Review snippets were truncated, so user quotes are partial.
Sources
- Transloadit homepagetransloadit.comofficial
- Transloadit pricingtransloadit.comofficial
- G2 reviewsg2.comreview
- Capterra reviewscapterra.careview
- SoftwareAdvice profilesoftwareadvice.comreview
- GetLatka revenue estimategetlatka.comnews
- Crunchbase profilecrunchbase.comnews
- CVE-2025-70023 — Uppy auth bypasssentinelone.comsecurity
- Uppy CVE listapp.opencve.iosecurity
- Transloadit security pagetransloadit.comsecurity
- WeTransfer case studytransloadit.comofficial
- Reddit r/PHP on chunked uploadsreddit.comreview
- Uppy 1.0 announcementuppy.ioofficial
Rate this review
Anonymous. You can change your vote.
Loading votes…
Ask a follow-up
Ask if a use case fits. Answers stay inside this report and its sources.
Comments
One queue. No replies. Give a display name first. Limit: 7 comments per day.
No comments yet.