shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Should I use Ubiq Security?

Identity-driven runtime data security — encryption-as-a-service via API - ubiqsecurity.com

Depends. Buy if you are an engineering-led company handling regulated PII and want app-layer encryption, tokenization, and key management through APIs. Skip if you need simple at-rest encryption, lack developers, or want a proven vendor with public pricing and many reviews.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~20 public sources; independent review volume is very thin (4 G2 reviews), and no pricing or named customers were found.

Ratings

  • Value for moneyNo public pricing evidence
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo support evidence found
  • Security posture

Pricing

Not disclosed

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed

Best for

  • Engineering teams adding app-layer encryption
  • Fintech and banking PII compliance
  • Teams needing tokenization plus data masking
  • Enterprises securing data feeding AI

Not for

  • Anyone needing simple disk or database encryption
  • Non-technical teams without developers
  • Buyers wanting transparent self-serve pricing
  • Small apps where built-in cloud KMS suffices

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Guess: encrypting through Ubiq's keys creates lock-in; migrating encrypted data later is nontrivial

medium

No published pricing; expect a negotiated enterprise contract

medium

Headline 4.8/5 G2 rating rests on just 4 reviews

low

SOC 2 report access appears gated to Enterprise customers

Pros and cons

Pros

  • SOC 2 Type II compliant
  • Deployment measured in hours, not days, per G2 reviewer
  • Lightweight API solution aimed at developers
  • Data-level security with fully integrated key management
  • Rated 4.8/5 on G2 encryption category

Cons

  • Only 4 G2 reviews — little independent validation
  • No public pricing; sales-led enterprise buying likely
  • Small vendor: ~$3M ARR, $6.4M raised — longevity risk
  • Requires developer SDK integration; not plug-and-play

Sources & method

Analyzed 10/02/2026 - 11 sources - SOC 2 Type II compliant. No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x4review x3news x4

Key stats

  • Ease of use: 4/5

    Rating

  • Not disclosed

    Starting price

  • 11

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money. No public pricing evidence
  • Ease of use: 4/5. Reviewers: deployment in hours, lightweight API
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Encryption, tokenization, masking, key management, AI access control
  • Support quality. No support evidence found
  • Security posture: 4/5. SOC 2 Type II; integrated key management
  • 4.8/5 G2 rating Only 4 reviews
  • ~$3M Estimated ARR 2024, GetLatka estimate
  • $6.4M Funding raised Seed round
  • 2013 Founded San Diego, CA

Pricing

Not disclosed

Security

SOC 2 Type II compliant.

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

Feedback is sparse but positive: reviewers praise fast, lightweight deployment and strong ratings, though the review volume is tiny.

“Deployment is measured in hours, not da...”
G2 review, Ubiq Encryption Platform
Full analysis

Based on ~20 public sources; independent review volume is very thin (4 G2 reviews), and no pricing or named customers were found.

Solid SOC 2 API encryption for dev teams, but tiny vendor, only 4 G2 reviews, no public pricing.

Methodology

Based on ~20 public sources; independent review volume is very thin (4 G2 reviews), and no pricing or named customers were found.

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. official
  5. official
  6. official
  7. news
  8. news
  9. news
  10. news
  11. Ubiq Security homepageubiqsecurity.com
    official

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.