shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

walt.id Review

Depends

Should I use walt.id?

The leading open source digital identity and wallet infrastructure. Trusted by thousands of developers, governments and businesses across industries. - walt.id

· 4 days ago

Walt.id fits teams building verifiable-credential wallets, national ID systems, and enterprise ID platforms. Teams needing simple login, published prices, or proven review data pick a managed alternative.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 13 public sources; independent review depth is thin.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of useNo usability evidence in reviewed sources
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo support evidence in reviewed sources
  • Security posture

Pricing

Free

Community Stack

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes
Enterprise StackContact sales

Best for

  • Governments building national digital ID wallets
  • Companies issuing and verifying credentials
  • Developers wanting open-source, self-hosted identity
  • Ecosystems needing issuer, verifier, and wallet together

Not for

  • Teams that only need app login and passwords
  • Buyers wanting published prices and turnkey SaaS
  • Non-technical teams without developers on staff
  • Risk-averse buyers needing deep independent review data

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Zero G2 reviews means little independent feedback before you commit.

medium

Enterprise pricing stays hidden until you talk to sales; budget time for procurement.

medium

Open-source model shifts maintenance, upgrades, and compliance work onto your team.

low

returned no content during our crawl; the security policy lives on GitHub.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Open source under Apache 2.0; self-host the whole stack
  • All-in-one stack covers issuing, verifying, and wallets
  • Built strictly on open standards
  • Free Community Stack lowers entry cost
  • Deployed in government and enterprise ID projects

Cons

  • G2 lists zero reviews and a 0.0 rating
  • Enterprise pricing is not published
  • You need developers; it is API and backend infrastructure
  • Self-hosting puts security and uptime work on your team

Sources & method

- 13 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x6review x3security x1news x3

Key stats

  • Value for money: 5/5

    Rating

  • Free

    Starting price

  • 13

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 5/5. Free open-source core, paid enterprise tier
  • Ease of use. No usability evidence in reviewed sources
  • Feature depth: 5/5. Issuer, verifier, and wallet in one stack
  • Support quality. No support evidence in reviewed sources
  • Security posture: 4/5. Security policy published, no known CVEs found
  • 0 G2 reviews No verified G2 reviews yet
  • Free Starting price Community Stack, open source
  • Yes Free tier Apache 2.0 licensed core

Pricing

Community Stack

Free

  • Self-host the open-source stack
  • Apache 2.0 license

Enterprise Stack

Not disclosed

  • ID wallet platforms for companies
  • Pricing not published

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

reviews are scarce: G2 lists zero reviews and Gartner shows a small set of positive comments.

“We really liked that walt.id has a stri”
Gartner Peer Insights

Alternatives

Compare walt.id with each alternative.

Companies that use it

  • ³
  • Inter-American Development Bank⁶
  • tomi
Full analysis

Based on 13 public sources; independent review depth is thin.

Open-source digital ID wallet infrastructure. Great for credential ecosystems and governments. Overkill if you just need app login.

Methodology

Based on 13 public sources; independent review depth is thin.

Read how a report is made.

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. news
  5. news
  6. news
  7. official
  8. official
  9. official
  10. official
  11. official
  12. official
  13. SECURITY.mdgithub.com
    security

Add this review to your site

This check for walt.id says Depends.

Put the badge on your site.

Visitors see the independent review.

The link points here, and search engines follow it.

This is the badge visitors see on your site.

Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.