5.0/5
G2 seller rating
Webhook ApS, 1 review
Report
Should I Use webhook.site?
Instantly generate a free, unique URL and email address to test, inspect, and automate incoming HTTP requests and emails
Worth it
Worth itBuy if you are a developer testing webhook or email callbacks — the free tier is instant and costs nothing.
Free instant webhook test URLs and inboxes — ideal for debugging integrations; wrong fit for production delivery or team workflows.
Confidence: Medium
$27/mo
Paid plan from
Pro, $270/yr
Yes
Free tier
Unique URL and test email inbox
7 days free
Data retention
365 days on paid
Value for money
5
Free tier; flat $27 Pro pricing
Ease of use
5
Instant unique URL, zero setup
Feature depth
4
Workflows, scripts, email testing included
Security posture
2
No product CVEs found; cited as abuse vector
Pros
Cons
Gotchas
- mediumFree tier deletes request data after 7 days; 365-day retention requires paid plans²
- mediumCollaboration is only in Enterprise — small teams must jump pricing tiers
- mediumCorporate security tools block it as a data-exfiltration channel; shared URLs can leak payloads10
- lowBootstrapped solo-founder company; support depth unclear before you commit12
Best for
- Developers testing webhook integrations
- Quick API request inspection without a server
- Testing inbound email callbacks
- Low-volume automation via Custom Actions
Not for
- Production webhook delivery — competitors target that gap directly
- Teams needing collaboration below the Enterprise tier
- Compliance-driven enterprises — no certifications found in sources
- Anyone wanting guaranteed support from a large vendor
Companies that use it
- PlateRecognizer
- OptinMonster
- Twilio SendGrid
Pricing
Free
$0
- Instant unique URL and email address
- 7-day data retention
Pro
$27/mo ($270/yr)
- 365-day data retention
- Custom Actions workflows
- Flat per-account pricing
Enterprise
Not disclosed
- Dedicated production environment
- Team collaboration
- Longest retention
Security
No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed; the service is widely cited by researchers as a data-exfiltration abuse channel, so corporate networks often block it.
- Commonly abused for data exfiltrationMITRE ATT&CK and security researchers cite public webhook services like as exfiltration channels; expect corporate blocks and treat shared URLs as public.10
What users say
Developers widely praise it for instant webhook testing, though some hit free-tier limits and built self-hosted alternatives.
“Thank you for webhook.site ! It's phe…”
“I had trouble with the webhook.site contai…”
“webhook.site does a lot of this already but it'…”
Alternatives
Compare webhook.site with each alternative.
Hookdeck
Event gateway built for production webhook routing, not just testing.
webhook.site vs HookdeckBeeceptor
Hosted API mocking plus webhook testing with lower-tier collaboration.
webhook.site vs BeeceptorHook0
Open-source webhook delivery service marketed as a migration path.
webhook.site vs Hook0RequestBin
Simpler request-capture bin; compared head-to-head with webhook.site.
webhook.site vs RequestBinFull analysis
Based on 12+ public sources; some snippets truncated, so detailed pricing and review counts are partially unavailable.
Sources
- Webhook.site homepagewebhook.siteofficial
- Webhook.site Docs: Basic, Pro and Enterprisedocs.webhook.siteofficial
- Webhook.site blog: Custom Actions vs Zapierwebhook.siteofficial
- webhooksite/webhook.site on GitHubgithub.comofficial
- Webhook.site on Product Huntproducthunt.comreview
- Webhook ApS on G2g2.comreview
- 7 best webhook tools for 2026 — Guideflowguideflow.comnews
- RequestBin vs Webhook.site — Slashdotslashdot.orgreview
review
- MITRE ATT&CK T1567.004: Exfiltration Over Webhookattack.mitre.orgsecurity
security
- Interview with the founder of Webhook.site — BoringCashCowboringcashcow.comnews
Rate this review
Anonymous. You can change your vote.
Loading votes…
Ask a follow-up
Ask if a use case fits. Answers stay inside this report and its sources.
Comments
One queue. No replies. Give a display name first. Limit: 7 comments per day.
No comments yet.