17,519
GitHub stars
open-source repo
Report
Built for teams to create and collaborate on internal software. Loved by engineers for full code flexibility and control over their infrastructure. Open-source and self-hostable.
Depends
DependsBuy if your team writes code and wants self-hostable, flexible workflow orchestration — and can patch fast.
Great code-first orchestration for engineering teams; overkill without devs, and an actively exploited CVE demands fast patching.
17,519
GitHub stars
open-source repo
4,000+
Organizations using
incl. 300+ enterprise customers
Yes
Free tier
unlimited executions free
4+
Languages supported
TypeScript, Python, Go, Bash
Open-source with free unlimited-execution tier
Code-first positioning demands engineering skill
Scripts, workflows, jobs, internal tools in one platform
Actively exploited CVE; no security page found
Free tier: Yes
Actively exploited CVE-2026-29059 (missing authorization) affects versions 1.56.0–1.614.0; official security page not found.
Public sources position Windmill as a code-first, open-source platform engineers like, but independent review quotes are scarce.
Compare Windmill with each alternative.
Visual low-code automation; easier for mixed technical teams
Windmill vs n8nGuess: Python-native data pipeline scheduling; heavier ops burden
Windmill vs Apache AirflowGuess: Durable execution engine for pure-code backend workflows
Windmill vs TemporalNo-code SaaS automation; zero infrastructure to run
Windmill vs ZapierBased on 20+ public sources; most echo the vendor tagline, few independent user reviews found.
Anonymous. You can change your vote.
Loading votes…
Ask if a use case fits. Answers stay inside this report and its sources.
Comments
One queue. No replies. Give a display name first. Limit: 7 comments per day.
No comments yet.